Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Fiserv, Inc. (FI)
FI leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Fiserv, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CLS vs FI
growth of $100 · last 27yCLS +3367.6%FI +1246.9%CLS compounded faster
CLS FI
CLS vs FI: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($42.83B vs $34.31B market cap).
- •FI trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.16 vs 44.99 P/E).
- •FI converts more revenue to profit (15.17% vs 6.95% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 7.29% CAGR).
Which is better, CLS or FI?
Metric tally: CLS 7 · FI 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFI(lower P/E)
GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCLS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | FI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.99 | 10.16● |
| Forward P/E | 37.36 | 7.69● |
| P/S ratio | 3.12 | 1.68● |
| P/B ratio | 21.04 | 1.42● |
| PEG ratio | 0.39● | 0.60 |
| EV / EBITDA | 31.98 | 7.32● |
| FCF yield | 1.14% | 16.67%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | FI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.61% | 30.86%● |
| Operating margin | 7.84% | 25.32%● |
| Net margin | 6.95% | 15.17%● |
| ROE | 46.86%● | 12.20% |
| ROIC | 27.74%● | 10.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | FI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 19.51%● | 7.29% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33%● | 34.70% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 26.52%● | 13.82% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 116.87%● | -11.04% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CLS or FI?
- It depends on your goal. value: FI (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FI leads 9 to 7.
- Is CLS or FI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FI is cheaper: CLS trades at a 44.99 P/E and FI at 10.16.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or FI?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus FI at 7.29%.
- Is CLS or FI more profitable?
- FI runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus FI at 15.17%.
- Which has been the better investment, CLS or FI?
- Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — CLS at 43.02% versus FI at 3.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioFiserv P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldFiserv dividend yieldCelestica ROEFiserv ROECelestica operating marginFiserv operating marginCelestica revenue growthFiserv revenue growthCelestica free cash flowFiserv free cash flow
Celestica & Fiserv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.