On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and K at 22.90.

Which has grown faster, CL or K?

Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus K at -1.30%.

Does CL or K pay a bigger dividend?

CL yields 2.34% and K yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Which has been the better investment, CL or K?

Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus K at 5.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Kellanova (K)

CL leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though K is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Kellanova across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Colgate-Palmolive Company

$71.58B

$89.45Consumer Defensive

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

Total return — CL vs K

growth of $100 · last 29y

CL +662.4%K +153.6%CL compounded faster

CL K

CL vs K: by the numbers

•CL is the larger company ($71.58B vs $29.03B market cap).
•K trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.90 vs 34.75 P/E).
•CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.46% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•CL pays the higher dividend yield (2.34% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, CL or K?

Metric tally: CL 8 · K 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueK(lower P/E)

GrowthCL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCL(higher dividend yield)

QualityCL(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	CL	K
P/E ratio	34.75	22.90●
Forward P/E	22.22	22.06
P/S ratio	3.46	2.30●
P/B ratio	496.66	6.95●
PEG ratio	—	0.51
EV / EBITDA	21.17	15.66●
FCF yield	5.23%●	2.05%

Profitability

Metric	CL	K
Gross margin	60.06%●	34.81%
Operating margin	21.21%●	14.61%
Net margin	10.04%	10.08%
ROE	1439.31%●	30.38%
ROIC	30.34%●	12.91%

Dividends

Metric	CL	K
Dividend yield	2.34%●	1.39%
Payout ratio	79.17%	29.59%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CL	K
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.46%●	-1.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.47%	0.30%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.88%●	-15.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.78%	11.22%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CL or K?: It depends on your goal. value: K (lower P/E); growth: CL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CL (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CL leads 8 to 6.
Is CL or K cheaper?: On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and K at 22.90.
Which has grown faster, CL or K?: Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus K at -1.30%.
Does CL or K pay a bigger dividend?: CL yields 2.34% and K yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Which has been the better investment, CL or K?: Over the past 10-year, K delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus K at 5.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CL analysis Full K analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratio Kellanova P/E ratio Colgate-Palmolive dividend yield Kellanova dividend yield Colgate-Palmolive ROE Kellanova ROE Colgate-Palmolive operating margin Kellanova operating margin Colgate-Palmolive revenue growth Kellanova revenue growth Colgate-Palmolive free cash flow Kellanova free cash flow

Colgate-Palmolive & Kellanova appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.