Cigna Corporation (CI) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO)
CI leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cigna Corporation and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CI
Cigna Corporation
$304.50Healthcare
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
$528.51Healthcare
Total return — CI vs TMO
growth of $100 · last 30yCI +2340.5%TMO +1455.9%CI compounded faster
CI TMO
CI vs TMO: by the numbers
- •TMO is the larger company ($196.41B vs $80.55B market cap).
- •CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.45 vs 28.97 P/E).
- •TMO converts more revenue to profit (15.18% vs 2.26% net margin).
- •CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 6.68% CAGR).
- •CI pays the higher dividend yield (2.13% vs 0.36%).
Which is better, CI or TMO?
Metric tally: CI 11 · TMO 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCI(lower P/E)
GrowthCI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCI(higher dividend yield)
QualityTMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CI | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.45● | 28.97 |
| Forward P/E | 9.64● | 21.20 |
| P/S ratio | 0.28● | 4.35 |
| P/B ratio | 1.84● | 3.78 |
| PEG ratio | 0.15● | 4.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.36● | 22.46 |
| FCF yield | 9.88%● | 3.43% |
Profitability
| Metric | CI | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 9.30% | 39.41%● |
| Operating margin | 3.42% | 17.76%● |
| Net margin | 2.26% | 15.18%● |
| ROE | 14.90%● | 13.21% |
| ROIC | 7.35% | 7.58%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CI | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.13%● | 0.36% |
| Payout ratio | 27.98% | 10.58% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CI | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.28%● | 6.68% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.76% | 1.99%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -2.03% | -0.19%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.09%● | 0.95% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CI or TMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); growth: CI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CI (higher dividend yield); quality: TMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 11 to 6.
- Is CI or TMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: CI trades at a 12.45 P/E and TMO at 28.97.
- Which has grown faster, CI or TMO?
- Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.28% CAGR versus TMO at 6.68%.
- Does CI or TMO pay a bigger dividend?
- CI yields 2.13% and TMO yields 0.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CI or TMO more profitable?
- TMO runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.26% versus TMO at 15.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, CI or TMO?
- Over the past 10-year, TMO delivered the higher annualized total return — CI at 9.91% versus TMO at 13.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cigna P/E ratioThermo Fisher Scientific P/E ratioCigna dividend yieldThermo Fisher Scientific dividend yieldCigna ROEThermo Fisher Scientific ROECigna operating marginThermo Fisher Scientific operating marginCigna revenue growthThermo Fisher Scientific revenue growthCigna free cash flowThermo Fisher Scientific free cash flow
Cigna & Thermo Fisher Scientific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 13, 2026.