Cigna Corporation (CI) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
CI leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cigna Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CI vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 30yCI +2291.7%QCOM +7150.7%QCOM compounded faster
CI QCOM
CI vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($223.15B vs $78.83B market cap).
- •CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.64 vs 22.72 P/E).
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 2.26% net margin).
- •CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •CI pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 1.70%).
Which is better, CI or QCOM?
Metric tally: CI 9 · QCOM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCI(lower P/E)
GrowthCI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCI(higher dividend yield)
QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.64● | 22.72 |
| Forward P/E | 8.91● | 19.72 |
| P/S ratio | 0.28● | 5.10 |
| P/B ratio | 1.87● | 8.32 |
| PEG ratio | 0.15● | 3.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.41● | 16.71 |
| FCF yield | 9.73%● | 5.51% |
Profitability
| Metric | CI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 9.30% | 54.80%● |
| Operating margin | 3.42% | 25.52%● |
| Net margin | 2.26% | 22.31%● |
| ROE | 14.90% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 7.35% | 13.15%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.06%● | 1.70% |
| Payout ratio | 27.53% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.28%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.76% | 5.74%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -2.03% | 9.39%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.19% | 11.87%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CI or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); growth: CI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CI (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 9 to 8.
- Is CI or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: CI trades at a 12.64 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, CI or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.28% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does CI or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- CI yields 2.06% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CI or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.26% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, CI or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, QCOM delivered the higher annualized total return — CI at 9.91% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cigna P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioCigna dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldCigna ROEQUALCOMM ROECigna operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginCigna revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthCigna free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Cigna & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.