On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: CI trades at a 12.29 P/E and EW at 49.81.

Which has grown faster, CI or EW?

Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.28% CAGR versus EW at 7.10%.

Does CI or EW pay a bigger dividend?

CI pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.

Is CI or EW more profitable?

EW runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.26% versus EW at 17.34%.

Which has been the better investment, CI or EW?

Over the past 10-year, EW delivered the higher annualized total return — CI at 9.48% versus EW at 10.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cigna Corporation (CI) vs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW)

CI leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cigna Corporation and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Cigna Corporation

$77.19B

$291.80Healthcare

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

$52.59B

$91.33Healthcare

Total return — CI vs EW

growth of $100 · last 26y

CI +1055.2%EW +6710.2%EW compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CI EW

CI vs EW: by the numbers

•CI is the larger company ($77.19B vs $52.59B market cap).
•CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.29 vs 49.81 P/E).
•EW converts more revenue to profit (17.34% vs 2.26% net margin).
•CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 7.10% CAGR).
•CI pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CI or EW?

Metric tally: CI 10 · EW 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCI(lower P/E)

GrowthCI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CI	EW
P/E ratio	12.29●	49.81
Forward P/E	9.51●	31.10
P/S ratio	0.28●	8.63
P/B ratio	1.81●	5.27
PEG ratio	0.15●	7.25
EV / EBITDA	8.28●	27.67
FCF yield	10.01%●	2.00%

Profitability

Metric	CI	EW
Gross margin	9.30%	78.01%●
Operating margin	3.42%	27.62%●
Net margin	2.26%	17.34%●
ROE	14.90%●	10.58%
ROIC	7.35%	11.40%●

Dividends

Metric	CI	EW
Dividend yield	2.15%	—
Payout ratio	27.98%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CI	EW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.28%●	7.10%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.76%	6.87%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-2.03%	8.74%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.54%●	-2.85%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CI or EW?: It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); growth: CI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 10 to 6.
Is CI or EW cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: CI trades at a 12.29 P/E and EW at 49.81.
Which has grown faster, CI or EW?: Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.28% CAGR versus EW at 7.10%.
Does CI or EW pay a bigger dividend?: CI pays a dividend (2.15% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
Is CI or EW more profitable?: EW runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.26% versus EW at 17.34%.
Which has been the better investment, CI or EW?: Over the past 10-year, EW delivered the higher annualized total return — CI at 9.48% versus EW at 10.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CI analysis Full EW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cigna P/E ratio Edwards Lifesciences P/E ratio Cigna dividend yield Edwards Lifesciences dividend yield Cigna ROE Edwards Lifesciences ROE Cigna operating margin Edwards Lifesciences operating margin Cigna revenue growth Edwards Lifesciences revenue growth Cigna free cash flow Edwards Lifesciences free cash flow

Cigna & Edwards Lifesciences appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.