Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) vs Loews Corporation (L)
CHTR leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Charter Communications, Inc. and Loews Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
$145.82Communication Services
L
Loews Corporation
$108.12Financial Services
Total return — CHTR vs L
growth of $100 · last 16yCHTR +316.6%L +187.2%CHTR compounded faster
CHTR L
CHTR vs L: by the numbers
- •L is the larger company ($22.25B vs $20.59B market cap).
- •CHTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.94 vs 13.77 P/E).
- •L converts more revenue to profit (10.22% vs 9.03% net margin).
- •L grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.43% vs 2.25% CAGR).
- •L pays a dividend (0.23% yield) while CHTR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CHTR or L?
Metric tally: CHTR 9 · L 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCHTR(lower P/E)
GrowthL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCHTR(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CHTR | L |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 3.94● | 13.77 |
| Forward P/E | 3.23 | — |
| P/S ratio | 0.34● | 1.22 |
| P/B ratio | 1.13● | 1.19 |
| PEG ratio | 1.47 | 0.55● |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.59● | 11.51 |
| FCF yield | 21.79%● | 9.79% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHTR | L |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.26% | 46.05%● |
| Operating margin | 24.11%● | 12.62% |
| Net margin | 9.03% | 10.22%● |
| ROE | 30.11%● | 9.99% |
| ROIC | 7.23%● | 3.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHTR | L |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.23% |
| Payout ratio | — | 3.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHTR | L |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.25% | 5.43%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.42%● | 17.17% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -10.92% | 17.24%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -26.64% | 14.35%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHTR or L?
- It depends on your goal. value: CHTR (lower P/E); growth: L (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CHTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHTR leads 9 to 6.
- Is CHTR or L cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CHTR is cheaper: CHTR trades at a 3.94 P/E and L at 13.77.
- Which has grown faster, CHTR or L?
- Over the past five years, L grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 2.25% CAGR versus L at 5.43%.
- Does CHTR or L pay a bigger dividend?
- L pays a dividend (0.23% yield) while CHTR does not currently pay one.
- Is CHTR or L more profitable?
- L runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.03% versus L at 10.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHTR or L?
- Over the past 10-year, L delivered the higher annualized total return — CHTR at -4.18% versus L at 11.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Charter Communications P/E ratioLoews P/E ratioCharter Communications dividend yieldLoews dividend yieldCharter Communications ROELoews ROECharter Communications operating marginLoews operating marginCharter Communications revenue growthLoews revenue growthCharter Communications free cash flowLoews free cash flow
Charter Communications & Loews appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.