C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Xylem Inc. (XYL)
XYL leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Xylem Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CHRW vs XYL
growth of $100 · last 15yCHRW +157.1%XYL +359.5%XYL compounded faster
CHRW XYL
CHRW vs XYL: by the numbers
- •XYL is the larger company ($26.48B vs $21.81B market cap).
- •XYL trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.72 vs 37.46 P/E).
- •XYL converts more revenue to profit (10.70% vs 3.70% net margin).
- •XYL grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.66% vs -1.20% CAGR).
- •XYL pays the higher dividend yield (1.49% vs 1.36%).
Which is better, CHRW or XYL?
Metric tally: CHRW 7 · XYL 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueXYL(lower P/E)
GrowthXYL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeXYL(higher dividend yield)
QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.46 | 27.72● |
| Forward P/E | 25.15 | 20.13● |
| P/S ratio | 1.38● | 2.98 |
| P/B ratio | 13.14 | 2.47● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29● | 4.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.53 | 15.74● |
| FCF yield | 3.83%● | 3.56% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 8.29% | 38.61%● |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 13.60%● |
| Net margin | 3.70% | 10.70%● |
| ROE | 35.15%● | 8.87% |
| ROIC | 19.58%● | 6.37% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | 1.49%● |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | 42.24% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.20% | 12.66%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | 22.76%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.97%● | 8.96% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.44%● | 0.86% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHRW or XYL?
- It depends on your goal. value: XYL (lower P/E); growth: XYL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: XYL (higher dividend yield); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, XYL leads 10 to 7.
- Is CHRW or XYL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, XYL is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 37.46 P/E and XYL at 27.72.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or XYL?
- Over the past five years, XYL grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus XYL at 12.66%.
- Does CHRW or XYL pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW yields 1.36% and XYL yields 1.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHRW or XYL more profitable?
- XYL runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus XYL at 10.70%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHRW or XYL?
- Over the past 10-year, CHRW delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.47% versus XYL at 10.70%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioXylem P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldXylem dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROEXylem ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginXylem operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthXylem revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowXylem free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Xylem appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.