C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Veralto Corporation (VLTO)
VLTO leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Veralto Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$187.07Industrials
VLTO
Veralto Corporation
$82.95Industrials
Total return — CHRW vs VLTO
growth of $100 · last 3yCHRW +120.2%VLTO +2.9%CHRW compounded faster
CHRW VLTO
CHRW vs VLTO: by the numbers
- •CHRW is the larger company ($22.05B vs $20.38B market cap).
- •VLTO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.43 vs 37.87 P/E).
- •VLTO converts more revenue to profit (17.33% vs 3.70% net margin).
- •VLTO grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.82% vs -1.20% CAGR).
- •CHRW pays the higher dividend yield (1.34% vs 0.58%).
Which is better, CHRW or VLTO?
Metric tally: CHRW 7 · VLTO 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueVLTO(lower P/E)
GrowthVLTO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCHRW(higher dividend yield)
QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.87 | 21.43● |
| Forward P/E | 25.43 | 19.54● |
| P/S ratio | 1.40● | 3.70 |
| P/B ratio | 13.28 | 6.88● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29● | 2.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.78 | 16.01● |
| FCF yield | 3.79% | 5.04%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 8.29% | 59.86%● |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 23.12%● |
| Net margin | 3.70% | 17.33%● |
| ROE | 35.15%● | 32.25% |
| ROIC | 19.58%● | 16.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.34%● | 0.58% |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | 12.66% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.20% | 4.82%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47%● | 5.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.97%● | 1.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.08% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHRW or VLTO?
- It depends on your goal. value: VLTO (lower P/E); growth: VLTO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CHRW (higher dividend yield); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VLTO leads 9 to 7.
- Is CHRW or VLTO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, VLTO is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 37.87 P/E and VLTO at 21.43.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or VLTO?
- Over the past five years, VLTO grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.
- Does CHRW or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW yields 1.34% and VLTO yields 0.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHRW or VLTO more profitable?
- VLTO runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus VLTO at 17.33%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioVeralto P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldVeralto dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROEVeralto ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginVeralto operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthVeralto revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowVeralto free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Veralto appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.