C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Everpure, Inc. (P)
CHRW leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Everpure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CHRW vs P
growth of $100 · last 11yCHRW +154.6%P +325.6%P compounded faster
CHRW P
CHRW vs P: by the numbers
- •P is the larger company ($24.06B vs $21.08B market cap).
- •CHRW trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.20 vs 109.64 P/E).
- •P converts more revenue to profit (5.75% vs 3.70% net margin).
- •P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs -1.20% CAGR).
- •CHRW pays a dividend (1.40% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CHRW or P?
Metric tally: CHRW 10 · P 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCHRW(lower P/E)
GrowthP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | P |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.20● | 109.64 |
| Forward P/E | 24.31 | — |
| P/S ratio | 1.34● | 6.00 |
| P/B ratio | 12.70● | 16.38 |
| PEG ratio | 1.29● | 2.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.76● | 55.86 |
| FCF yield | 3.96%● | 0.66% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | P |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 8.29% | 70.23%● |
| Operating margin | 4.90%● | 4.21% |
| Net margin | 3.70% | 5.75%● |
| ROE | 35.15%● | 15.69% |
| ROIC | 19.58%● | 3.43% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | P |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | — |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | P |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.20% | 17.87%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.97%● | 15.82% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.27% | 29.69%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHRW or P?
- It depends on your goal. value: CHRW (lower P/E); growth: P (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHRW leads 10 to 4.
- Is CHRW or P cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CHRW is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 36.20 P/E and P at 109.64.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or P?
- Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus P at 17.87%.
- Does CHRW or P pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW pays a dividend (1.40% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
- Is CHRW or P more profitable?
- P runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus P at 5.75%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHRW or P?
- Over the past 10-year, P delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.10% versus P at 20.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioEverpure P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldEverpure dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROEEverpure ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginEverpure operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthEverpure revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowEverpure free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Everpure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.