Is CHRW or NVT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CHRW is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 38.45 P/E and NVT at 51.59.

Which has grown faster, CHRW or NVT?

Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus NVT at 16.38%.

Does CHRW or NVT pay a bigger dividend?

CHRW yields 1.33% and NVT yields 0.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CHRW or NVT more profitable?

NVT runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus NVT at 11.33%.

Which has been the better investment, CHRW or NVT?

Over the past 5-year, NVT delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.39% versus NVT at 40.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs nVent Electric plc (NVT)

CHRW leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and nVent Electric plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CHRW

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Total return — CHRW vs NVT

growth of $100 · last 8y

CHRW +97.8%NVT +506.9%NVT compounded faster

CHRW NVT

CHRW vs NVT: by the numbers

•NVT is the larger company ($25.56B vs $22.72B market cap).
•CHRW trades at the lower earnings multiple (38.45 vs 51.59 P/E).
•NVT converts more revenue to profit (11.33% vs 3.70% net margin).
•NVT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.38% vs -1.20% CAGR).
•CHRW pays the higher dividend yield (1.33% vs 0.54%).

Which is better, CHRW or NVT?

Metric tally: CHRW 9 · NVT 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCHRW(lower P/E)

GrowthNVT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCHRW(higher dividend yield)

QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHRW	NVT
P/E ratio	38.45●	51.59
Forward P/E	30.88●	33.76
P/S ratio	1.42●	5.87
P/B ratio	13.49	6.69●
PEG ratio	1.29	0.20●
EV / EBITDA	27.32●	29.48
FCF yield	3.73%●	1.50%

Profitability

Metric	CHRW	NVT
Gross margin	8.29%	37.01%●
Operating margin	4.90%	15.92%●
Net margin	3.70%	11.33%●
ROE	35.15%●	12.91%
ROIC	19.58%●	8.15%

Dividends

Metric	CHRW	NVT
Dividend yield	1.33%●	0.54%
Payout ratio	51.64%	19.27%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHRW	NVT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.20%	16.38%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.47%	22.34%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.97%●	1.91%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.34%	40.50%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CHRW or NVT?: It depends on your goal. value: CHRW (lower P/E); growth: NVT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CHRW (higher dividend yield); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHRW leads 9 to 8.
Is CHRW or NVT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CHRW is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 38.45 P/E and NVT at 51.59.
Which has grown faster, CHRW or NVT?: Over the past five years, NVT grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus NVT at 16.38%.
Does CHRW or NVT pay a bigger dividend?: CHRW yields 1.33% and NVT yields 0.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CHRW or NVT more profitable?: NVT runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus NVT at 11.33%.
Which has been the better investment, CHRW or NVT?: Over the past 5-year, NVT delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.39% versus NVT at 40.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHRW analysis Full NVT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratio nVent Electric P/E ratio C.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yield nVent Electric dividend yield C.H. Robinson Worldwide ROE nVent Electric ROE C.H. Robinson Worldwide operating margin nVent Electric operating margin C.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growth nVent Electric revenue growth C.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flow nVent Electric free cash flow

C.H. Robinson Worldwide & nVent Electric appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.