C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC)
CHRW leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Generac Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$185.04Industrials
GNRC
Generac Holdings Inc.
$279.15Industrials
Total return — CHRW vs GNRC
growth of $100 · last 16yCHRW +248.5%GNRC +3199.4%GNRC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CHRW GNRC
CHRW vs GNRC: by the numbers
- •CHRW is the larger company ($21.81B vs $16.43B market cap).
- •CHRW trades at the lower earnings multiple (37.46 vs 87.51 P/E).
- •GNRC converts more revenue to profit (4.37% vs 3.70% net margin).
- •GNRC grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.96% vs -1.20% CAGR).
- •CHRW pays a dividend (1.36% yield) while GNRC does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CHRW or GNRC?
Metric tally: CHRW 9 · GNRC 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCHRW(lower P/E)
GrowthGNRC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | GNRC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.46● | 87.51 |
| Forward P/E | 25.15 | 25.37 |
| P/S ratio | 1.38● | 3.82 |
| P/B ratio | 13.14 | 6.18● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.53● | 34.43 |
| FCF yield | 3.83%● | 2.00% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | GNRC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 8.29% | 38.14%● |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 7.46%● |
| Net margin | 3.70% | 4.37%● |
| ROE | 35.15%● | 7.07% |
| ROIC | 19.58%● | 5.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | GNRC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | — |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | GNRC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.20% | 8.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47%● | -13.42% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.97%● | -9.70% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.44%● | -6.30% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHRW or GNRC?
- It depends on your goal. value: CHRW (lower P/E); growth: GNRC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHRW leads 9 to 5.
- Is CHRW or GNRC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CHRW is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 37.46 P/E and GNRC at 87.51.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or GNRC?
- Over the past five years, GNRC grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus GNRC at 8.96%.
- Does CHRW or GNRC pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW pays a dividend (1.36% yield) while GNRC does not currently pay one.
- Is CHRW or GNRC more profitable?
- GNRC runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus GNRC at 4.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHRW or GNRC?
- Over the past 10-year, GNRC delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.47% versus GNRC at 22.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioGenerac P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldGenerac dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROEGenerac ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginGenerac operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthGenerac revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowGenerac free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Generac appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.