C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Fortive Corporation (FTV)
FTV leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Fortive Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$185.04Industrials
FTV
Fortive Corporation
$61.03Industrials
Total return — CHRW vs FTV
growth of $100 · last 10yCHRW +146.1%FTV +99.1%CHRW compounded faster
CHRW FTV
CHRW vs FTV: by the numbers
- •CHRW is the larger company ($21.81B vs $18.61B market cap).
- •FTV trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.33 vs 37.46 P/E).
- •FTV converts more revenue to profit (11.48% vs 3.70% net margin).
- •FTV grew revenue faster over the past five years (-0.20% vs -1.20% CAGR).
- •CHRW pays the higher dividend yield (1.36% vs 0.29%).
Which is better, CHRW or FTV?
Metric tally: CHRW 7 · FTV 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFTV(lower P/E)
GrowthFTV(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCHRW(higher dividend yield)
QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.46 | 36.33● |
| Forward P/E | 25.15 | 18.97● |
| P/S ratio | 1.38● | 4.03 |
| P/B ratio | 13.14 | 3.14● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.53 | 18.16● |
| FCF yield | 3.83% | 5.09%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 8.29% | 61.83%● |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 17.73%● |
| Net margin | 3.70% | 11.48%● |
| ROE | 35.15%● | 8.94% |
| ROIC | 19.58%● | 7.44% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.36%● | 0.29% |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | 10.29% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.20% | -0.20%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47%● | -17.51% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.97%● | -7.26% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.44%● | 3.69% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHRW or FTV?
- It depends on your goal. value: FTV (lower P/E); growth: FTV (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CHRW (higher dividend yield); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FTV leads 9 to 7.
- Is CHRW or FTV cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FTV is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 37.46 P/E and FTV at 36.33.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or FTV?
- Over the past five years, FTV grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus FTV at -0.20%.
- Does CHRW or FTV pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW yields 1.36% and FTV yields 0.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHRW or FTV more profitable?
- FTV runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus FTV at 11.48%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHRW or FTV?
- Over the past 5-year, CHRW delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.47% versus FTV at 3.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioFortive P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldFortive dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROEFortive ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginFortive operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthFortive revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowFortive free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Fortive appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.