Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHD or MNST?

CHD has the lower trailing P/E: CHD trades at 30.37 and MNST at 40.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHD or MNST?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — CHD at a 4.30% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.

Does CHD or MNST pay a bigger dividend?

CHD pays a dividend (1.30% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CHD or MNST more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — CHD at 11.96% versus MNST at 23.08%.

How have CHD and MNST total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CHD delivered 8.47% and MNST delivered 13.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CHD

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

$22.31B

$94.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$84.89B

$43.40Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CHD vs MNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CHD +117.5% (+8.1%/yr)MNST +253.2% (+13.4%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

CHD MNST

CHD vs MNST: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($84.89B vs $22.31B market cap).
•CHD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.37 vs 40.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 11.96% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 4.30% CAGR).
•CHD pays a dividend (1.30% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHD	MNST
P/E ratio	30.37	40.00
Forward P/E	24.91	37.40
P/S ratio	3.58	9.21
P/B ratio	5.13	9.07
EV / EBITDA	18.32	28.61
FCF yield	5.00%	2.47%

Profitability

Metric	CHD	MNST
Gross margin	45.65%	55.55%
Operating margin	17.47%	29.16%
Net margin	11.96%	23.08%
ROE	17.13%	22.72%
ROIC	10.83%	21.32%

Dividends

Metric	CHD	MNST
Dividend yield	1.30%	N/A
Payout ratio	39.27%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHD	MNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.30%	12.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.90%	7.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.29%	7.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.81%	12.44%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHD or MNST?: CHD has the lower trailing P/E: CHD trades at 30.37 and MNST at 40.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHD or MNST?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — CHD at a 4.30% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
Does CHD or MNST pay a bigger dividend?: CHD pays a dividend (1.30% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CHD or MNST more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — CHD at 11.96% versus MNST at 23.08%.
How have CHD and MNST total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CHD delivered 8.47% and MNST delivered 13.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHD analysis Full MNST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Church & Dwight P/E ratio Monster Beverage P/E ratio Church & Dwight dividend yield Church & Dwight ROE Monster Beverage ROE Church & Dwight operating margin Monster Beverage operating margin Church & Dwight revenue growth Monster Beverage revenue growth Church & Dwight free cash flow Monster Beverage free cash flow

Church & Dwight & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.