Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
MNST leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though CHD is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
$97.56Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare CHD and MNST.
CHD vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($90.79B vs $23.12B market cap).
- •CHD trades at the lower earnings multiple (32.20 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 11.81% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 4.54% CAGR).
- •CHD pays a dividend (1.24% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CHD or MNST?
Metric tally: CHD 7 · MNST 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCHD(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CHD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.20● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 24.23● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 3.74● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 5.55● | 10.51 |
| PEG ratio | 1.02● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.42● | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | 4.59%● | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.07% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 17.30% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 11.81% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 17.51% | 23.28%● |
| ROIC | 11.19% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CHD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | — |
| Payout ratio | 39.64% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.90% | 7.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.43% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.10% | 14.70%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHD or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: CHD (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 7.
- Is CHD or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CHD is cheaper: CHD trades at a 32.20 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, CHD or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — CHD at a 4.54% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does CHD or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- CHD pays a dividend (1.24% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is CHD or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — CHD at 11.81% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHD or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — CHD at 8.32% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Church & Dwight P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioChurch & Dwight dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldChurch & Dwight ROEMonster Beverage ROEChurch & Dwight operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginChurch & Dwight revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthChurch & Dwight free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Church & Dwight & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.