Which has grown faster, CF or MP?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — CF at a 12.01% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.

Does CF or MP pay a bigger dividend?

CF pays a dividend (1.96% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is CF or MP more profitable?

CF runs the higher net margin — CF at 23.73% versus MP at -20.48%.

Which has been the better investment, CF or MP?

Over the past 5-year, CF delivered the higher annualized total return — CF at 17.11% versus MP at 10.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) vs MP Materials Corp. (MP)

CF leads on 10 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and MP Materials Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

$15.70B

$102.17Basic Materials

MP Materials Corp.

$10.13B

$58.90Basic Materials

Total return — CF vs MP

growth of $100 · last 6y

CF +238.9%MP +489.0%MP compounded faster

CF MP

CF vs MP: by the numbers

•CF is the larger company ($15.70B vs $10.13B market cap).
•CF is profitable (23.73% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 12.01% CAGR).
•CF pays a dividend (1.96% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CF or MP?

Metric tally: CF 10 · MP 1

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CF	MP
P/E ratio	9.18	—
Forward P/E	8.90●	58.78
P/S ratio	2.13●	33.76
P/B ratio	2.95●	4.93
PEG ratio	0.26	—
EV / EBITDA	4.68●	633.92
FCF yield	10.27%	—

Profitability

Metric	CF	MP
Gross margin	40.41%●	24.16%
Operating margin	35.68%●	-39.42%
Net margin	23.73%●	-20.48%
ROE	32.91%●	-2.99%
ROIC	14.27%●	-2.36%

Dividends

Metric	CF	MP
Dividend yield	1.96%	—
Payout ratio	22.27%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CF	MP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.01%	14.90%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	43.52%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.13%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.31%●	10.24%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CF or MP?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CF leads 10 to 1.
Which has grown faster, CF or MP?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — CF at a 12.01% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.
Does CF or MP pay a bigger dividend?: CF pays a dividend (1.96% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is CF or MP more profitable?: CF runs the higher net margin — CF at 23.73% versus MP at -20.48%.
Which has been the better investment, CF or MP?: Over the past 5-year, CF delivered the higher annualized total return — CF at 17.11% versus MP at 10.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CF analysis Full MP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CF Industries P/E ratio MP Materials P/E ratio CF Industries dividend yield MP Materials dividend yield CF Industries ROE MP Materials ROE CF Industries operating margin MP Materials operating margin CF Industries revenue growth MP Materials revenue growth CF Industries free cash flow MP Materials free cash flow

CF Industries & MP Materials appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.