Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
CELH leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though SIMO is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$27.12Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CELH vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 20yCELH +103.5%SIMO +1997.9%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CELH SIMO
CELH vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $6.93B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 67.80 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 5.85% net margin).
- •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CELH or SIMO?
Metric tally: CELH 8 · SIMO 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthCELH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCELH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CELH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 67.80 | 21.10● |
| Forward P/E | 16.95● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 5.63 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | 1.53 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.91 | 16.83● |
| FCF yield | 4.16%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | CELH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.62%● | 48.09% |
| Operating margin | 18.63%● | 12.77% |
| Net margin | 5.85% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 13.89% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 10.01%● | 9.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | CELH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CELH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 81.07%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.28% | 44.85% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 142.28%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.49% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CELH or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: CELH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CELH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CELH leads 8 to 7.
- Is CELH or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: CELH trades at a 67.80 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, CELH or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does CELH or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
- Is CELH or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, CELH or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, CELH delivered the higher annualized total return — CELH at 44.13% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celsius P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioCelsius dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldCelsius ROESilicon Motion Technology ROECelsius operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginCelsius revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthCelsius free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Celsius & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.