Is CELH or SFD cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SFD is cheaper: CELH trades at a 75.52 P/E and SFD at 10.01.

Which has grown faster, CELH or SFD?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus SFD at 0.92%.

Does CELH or SFD pay a bigger dividend?

SFD pays a dividend (4.39% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.

Is CELH or SFD more profitable?

SFD runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus SFD at 6.48%.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD)

SFD leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Smithfield Foods, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$7.66B

$29.98Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SFD

Smithfield Foods, Inc.

$10.08B

$25.62Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CELH vs SFD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y

CELH +19.1%SFD +33.9%SFD compounded faster

CELH SFD

CELH vs SFD: by the numbers

•SFD is the larger company ($10.08B vs $7.66B market cap).
•SFD trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.01 vs 75.52 P/E).
•SFD converts more revenue to profit (6.48% vs 5.85% net margin).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 0.92% CAGR).
•SFD pays a dividend (4.39% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CELH or SFD?

Metric tally: CELH 7 · SFD 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSFD(lower P/E)

GrowthCELH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCELH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	SFD
P/E ratio	75.52	10.01●
Forward P/E	18.88	9.67●
P/S ratio	2.64	0.65●
P/B ratio	6.27	1.47●
PEG ratio	1.71●	2.42
EV / EBITDA	28.24	6.64●
FCF yield	3.73%	8.05%●

Profitability

Metric	CELH	SFD
Gross margin	49.62%●	13.44%
Operating margin	18.63%●	8.62%
Net margin	5.85%	6.48%●
ROE	13.89%	14.69%●
ROIC	10.01%●	9.58%

Dividends

Metric	CELH	SFD
Dividend yield	—	4.39%
Payout ratio	—	44.82%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	SFD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	81.07%●	0.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%●	7.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	142.28%●	5.08%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.05%	—

Frequently asked

Which is better, CELH or SFD?: It depends on your goal. value: SFD (lower P/E); growth: CELH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CELH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SFD leads 8 to 7.
Is CELH or SFD cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SFD is cheaper: CELH trades at a 75.52 P/E and SFD at 10.01.
Which has grown faster, CELH or SFD?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus SFD at 0.92%.
Does CELH or SFD pay a bigger dividend?: SFD pays a dividend (4.39% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
Is CELH or SFD more profitable?: SFD runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus SFD at 6.48%.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full SFD analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio Smithfield Foods P/E ratio Celsius dividend yield Smithfield Foods dividend yield Celsius ROE Smithfield Foods ROE Celsius operating margin Smithfield Foods operating margin Celsius revenue growth Smithfield Foods revenue growth Celsius free cash flow Smithfield Foods free cash flow

Celsius & Smithfield Foods appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.