Is CDNS or UBER cheaper?

On trailing earnings, UBER is cheaper: CDNS trades at a 91.96 P/E and UBER at 18.17.

Which has grown faster, CDNS or UBER?

Over the past five years, UBER grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 14.78% CAGR versus UBER at 37.83%.

Is CDNS or UBER more profitable?

CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 21.18% versus UBER at 15.91%.

Which has been the better investment, CDNS or UBER?

Over the past 5-year, CDNS delivered the higher annualized total return — CDNS at 32.12% versus UBER at 8.12%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)

UBER leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CDNS

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

$108.81B

$394.50Technology

UBER

Uber Technologies, Inc.

$148.29B

$72.85Technology

Total return — CDNS vs UBER

growth of $100 · last 7y

CDNS +474.2%UBER +75.2%CDNS compounded faster

CDNS UBER

CDNS vs UBER: by the numbers

•UBER is the larger company ($148.29B vs $108.81B market cap).
•UBER trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.17 vs 91.96 P/E).
•CDNS converts more revenue to profit (21.18% vs 15.91% net margin).
•UBER grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.83% vs 14.78% CAGR).

Which is better, CDNS or UBER?

Metric tally: CDNS 5 · UBER 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueUBER(lower P/E)

GrowthUBER(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCDNS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CDNS	UBER
P/E ratio	91.96	18.17●
Forward P/E	42.15	16.51●
P/S ratio	19.53	2.81●
P/B ratio	16.46	6.10●
PEG ratio	14.88	7.26●
EV / EBITDA	57.84	25.80●
FCF yield	1.32%	6.49%●

Profitability

Metric	CDNS	UBER
Gross margin	88.85%●	41.03%
Operating margin	31.11%●	11.66%
Net margin	21.18%●	15.91%
ROE	17.85%	34.50%●
ROIC	14.11%●	11.21%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CDNS	UBER
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.78%	37.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.62%	34.99%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.44%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	24.97%●	8.12%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CDNS or UBER?: It depends on your goal. value: UBER (lower P/E); growth: UBER (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CDNS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UBER leads 10 to 5.
Is CDNS or UBER cheaper?: On trailing earnings, UBER is cheaper: CDNS trades at a 91.96 P/E and UBER at 18.17.
Which has grown faster, CDNS or UBER?: Over the past five years, UBER grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 14.78% CAGR versus UBER at 37.83%.
Is CDNS or UBER more profitable?: CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 21.18% versus UBER at 15.91%.
Which has been the better investment, CDNS or UBER?: Over the past 5-year, CDNS delivered the higher annualized total return — CDNS at 32.12% versus UBER at 8.12%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CDNS analysis Full UBER analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cadence Design Systems P/E ratio Uber Technologies P/E ratio Cadence Design Systems dividend yield Uber Technologies dividend yield Cadence Design Systems ROE Uber Technologies ROE Cadence Design Systems operating margin Uber Technologies operating margin Cadence Design Systems revenue growth Uber Technologies revenue growth Cadence Design Systems free cash flow Uber Technologies free cash flow

Cadence Design Systems & Uber Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.