Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
TPL leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Texas Pacific Land Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CCJ vs TPL
growth of $100 · last 30yCCJ +1234.5%TPL +60480.4%TPL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CCJ TPL
CCJ vs TPL: by the numbers
- •CCJ is the larger company ($45.51B vs $27.30B market cap).
- •TPL trades at the lower earnings multiple (54.27 vs 95.52 P/E).
- •TPL converts more revenue to profit (60.03% vs 18.49% net margin).
- •TPL grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.67% vs 13.99% CAGR).
- •TPL pays the higher dividend yield (0.61% vs 0.16%).
Which is better, CCJ or TPL?
Metric tally: CCJ 7 · TPL 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTPL(lower P/E)
GrowthTPL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTPL(higher dividend yield)
QualityTPL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CCJ | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 95.52 | 54.27● |
| Forward P/E | 39.61● | 43.17 |
| P/S ratio | 17.73● | 32.55 |
| P/B ratio | 12.47● | 17.55 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39● | 6.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 69.90 | 39.30● |
| FCF yield | 1.48% | 1.81%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CCJ | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.79% | 85.46%● |
| Operating margin | 16.59% | 74.42%● |
| Net margin | 18.49% | 60.03%● |
| ROE | 13.00% | 32.37%● |
| ROIC | 4.77% | 30.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CCJ | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.61%● |
| Payout ratio | 17.49% | 34.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CCJ | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.99% | 23.67%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.38%● | 22.57% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 27.36%● | 18.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 39.58%● | 18.39% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CCJ or TPL?
- It depends on your goal. value: TPL (lower P/E); growth: TPL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TPL (higher dividend yield); quality: TPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TPL leads 10 to 7.
- Is CCJ or TPL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TPL is cheaper: CCJ trades at a 95.52 P/E and TPL at 54.27.
- Which has grown faster, CCJ or TPL?
- Over the past five years, TPL grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus TPL at 23.67%.
- Does CCJ or TPL pay a bigger dividend?
- CCJ yields 0.16% and TPL yields 0.61% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CCJ or TPL more profitable?
- TPL runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus TPL at 60.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, CCJ or TPL?
- Over the past 10-year, TPL delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 26.50% versus TPL at 37.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cameco P/E ratioTexas Pacific Land P/E ratioCameco dividend yieldTexas Pacific Land dividend yieldCameco ROETexas Pacific Land ROECameco operating marginTexas Pacific Land operating marginCameco revenue growthTexas Pacific Land revenue growthCameco free cash flowTexas Pacific Land free cash flow
Cameco & Texas Pacific Land appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.