Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or TPL?

TPL has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 165.74 and TPL at 47.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CCJ or TPL?

Over the past five years, TPL grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus TPL at 22.25%.

Does CCJ or TPL pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.18% and TPL yields 0.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or TPL more profitable?

TPL runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus TPL at 60.32%.

How have CCJ and TPL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.35% and TPL delivered 36.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Texas Pacific Land Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CCJ

Cameco Corporation

$42.67B

$97.98EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TPL

Texas Pacific Land Corporation

$25.74B

$373.18EnergyAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — CCJ vs TPL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CCJ +1040.9% (+27.6%/yr)TPL +2173.5% (+36.7%/yr)TPL compounded faster over this window

CCJ TPL

CCJ vs TPL: by the numbers

•CCJ is the larger company ($42.67B vs $25.74B market cap).
•TPL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (47.60 vs 165.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TPL converts more revenue to profit (60.32% vs 10.29% net margin).
•TPL grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.25% vs 15.08% CAGR).
•TPL pays the higher dividend yield (0.51% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	TPL
P/E ratio	165.74	47.60
Forward P/E	59.79	43.10
P/S ratio	17.10	28.70
P/B ratio	8.49	15.40
EV / EBITDA	73.06	34.50
FCF yield	0.91%	2.04%

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	TPL
Gross margin	27.91%	85.46%
Operating margin	14.57%	74.92%
Net margin	10.29%	60.32%
ROE	5.11%	32.37%
ROIC	4.10%	30.14%

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	TPL
Dividend yield	0.18%	0.51%
Payout ratio	17.49%	27.38%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	TPL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	22.25%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%	22.57%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.00%	19.60%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	44.72%	21.93%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or TPL?: TPL has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 165.74 and TPL at 47.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or TPL?: Over the past five years, TPL grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus TPL at 22.25%.
Does CCJ or TPL pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.18% and TPL yields 0.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or TPL more profitable?: TPL runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus TPL at 60.32%.
How have CCJ and TPL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.35% and TPL delivered 36.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full TPL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio Texas Pacific L P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield Texas Pacific L dividend yield Cameco ROE Texas Pacific L ROE Cameco operating margin Texas Pacific L operating margin Cameco revenue growth Texas Pacific L revenue growth Cameco free cash flow Texas Pacific L free cash flow

Cameco & Texas Pacific L appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.