Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Phillips 66 (PSX)
PSX leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Phillips 66 across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CCJ vs PSX
growth of $100 · last 14yCCJ +443.2%PSX +409.6%CCJ compounded faster
CCJ PSX
CCJ vs PSX: by the numbers
- •PSX is the larger company ($69.47B vs $46.61B market cap).
- •PSX trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.07 vs 97.84 P/E).
- •CCJ converts more revenue to profit (18.49% vs 3.04% net margin).
- •PSX grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.79% vs 13.99% CAGR).
- •PSX pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.16%).
Which is better, CCJ or PSX?
Metric tally: CCJ 7 · PSX 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePSX(lower P/E)
GrowthPSX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePSX(higher dividend yield)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CCJ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 97.84 | 17.07● |
| Forward P/E | 40.69 | 10.08● |
| P/S ratio | 18.16 | 0.51● |
| P/B ratio | 12.77 | 2.45● |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.10● |
| EV / EBITDA | 53.44 | 10.00● |
| FCF yield | 1.41%● | 0.17% |
Profitability
| Metric | CCJ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.79%● | 7.04% |
| Operating margin | 16.59%● | 4.67% |
| Net margin | 18.49%● | 3.04% |
| ROE | 13.00% | 14.45%● |
| ROIC | 4.77% | 4.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | CCJ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 2.85%● |
| Payout ratio | 17.49% | 45.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CCJ | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.99% | 15.79%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.38%● | 8.08% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 26.83%● | -16.26% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 39.96%● | 17.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CCJ or PSX?
- It depends on your goal. value: PSX (lower P/E); growth: PSX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PSX (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, PSX leads 9 to 7.
- Is CCJ or PSX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PSX is cheaper: CCJ trades at a 97.84 P/E and PSX at 17.07.
- Which has grown faster, CCJ or PSX?
- Over the past five years, PSX grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus PSX at 15.79%.
- Does CCJ or PSX pay a bigger dividend?
- CCJ yields 0.16% and PSX yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CCJ or PSX more profitable?
- CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus PSX at 3.04%.
- Which has been the better investment, CCJ or PSX?
- Over the past 10-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 26.36% versus PSX at 12.29%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cameco P/E ratioPhillips 66 P/E ratioCameco dividend yieldPhillips 66 dividend yieldCameco ROEPhillips 66 ROECameco operating marginPhillips 66 operating marginCameco revenue growthPhillips 66 revenue growthCameco free cash flowPhillips 66 free cash flow
Cameco & Phillips 66 appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.