Which has grown faster, CCJ or HP?

Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.

Does CCJ or HP pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.16% and HP yields 2.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or HP more profitable?

CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus HP at -9.39%.

Which has been the better investment, CCJ or HP?

Over the past 10-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 26.36% versus HP at -0.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP)

CCJ leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

$3.70B

$37.00Energy

Total return — CCJ vs HP

growth of $100 · last 30y

CCJ +1288.1%HP +512.6%CCJ compounded faster

CCJ HP

CCJ vs HP: by the numbers

•CCJ is the larger company ($46.61B vs $3.70B market cap).
•CCJ is profitable (18.49% net margin) while HP runs a net loss (-9.39%).
•HP grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.24% vs 13.99% CAGR).
•HP pays the higher dividend yield (2.70% vs 0.16%).

Which is better, CCJ or HP?

Metric tally: CCJ 8 · HP 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeHP(higher dividend yield)

QualityCCJ(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	HP
P/E ratio	97.84	—
Forward P/E	40.69	23.43●
P/S ratio	18.16	0.92●
P/B ratio	12.77	1.46●
PEG ratio	0.39	—
EV / EBITDA	53.44	10.68●
FCF yield	1.41%	6.93%●

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	HP
Gross margin	29.79%●	11.29%
Operating margin	16.59%●	-1.85%
Net margin	18.49%●	-9.39%
ROE	13.00%●	-14.86%
ROIC	4.77%●	3.92%

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	HP
Dividend yield	0.16%	2.70%●
Payout ratio	17.49%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	HP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.99%	30.24%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%●	-4.17%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.83%●	-2.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	39.96%●	5.49%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CCJ or HP?: It depends on your goal. growth: HP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HP (higher dividend yield); quality: CCJ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CCJ leads 8 to 7.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or HP?: Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.
Does CCJ or HP pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.16% and HP yields 2.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or HP more profitable?: CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus HP at -9.39%.
Which has been the better investment, CCJ or HP?: Over the past 10-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 26.36% versus HP at -0.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full HP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio Helmerich & Payne P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield Helmerich & Payne dividend yield Cameco ROE Helmerich & Payne ROE Cameco operating margin Helmerich & Payne operating margin Cameco revenue growth Helmerich & Payne revenue growth Cameco free cash flow Helmerich & Payne free cash flow

Cameco & Helmerich & Payne appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.