Chubb Limited (CB) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)
CB leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Chubb Limited and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CB
Chubb Limited
$328.14Financial Services
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$903.48Industrials
Total return — CB vs PH
growth of $100 · last 30yCB +2093.4%PH +4888.8%PH compounded faster
CB PH
CB vs PH: by the numbers
- •CB is the larger company ($127.27B vs $113.92B market cap).
- •CB trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.59 vs 33.34 P/E).
- •CB converts more revenue to profit (18.48% vs 16.58% net margin).
- •CB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.76% vs 9.15% CAGR).
- •CB pays the higher dividend yield (1.20% vs 0.82%).
Which is better, CB or PH?
Metric tally: CB 9 · PH 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCB(lower P/E)
GrowthCB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCB(higher dividend yield)
QualityPH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CB | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.59● | 33.34 |
| Forward P/E | 12.11● | 26.53 |
| P/S ratio | 2.12● | 5.51 |
| P/B ratio | 1.75● | 7.92 |
| PEG ratio | 0.93● | 1.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 22.16 |
| FCF yield | — | 3.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | CB | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.20% | 37.23%● |
| Operating margin | 18.61% | 20.87%● |
| Net margin | 18.48%● | 16.58% |
| ROE | 15.31% | 23.82%● |
| ROIC | 7.95% | 13.69%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CB | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.20%● | 0.82% |
| Payout ratio | 15.17% | 26.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CB | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.76%● | 9.15% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.08%● | 24.00% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 8.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.27% | 26.11%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CB or PH?
- It depends on your goal. value: CB (lower P/E); growth: CB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CB (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CB leads 9 to 5.
- Is CB or PH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CB is cheaper: CB trades at a 11.59 P/E and PH at 33.34.
- Which has grown faster, CB or PH?
- Over the past five years, CB grew revenue faster — CB at a 9.76% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
- Does CB or PH pay a bigger dividend?
- CB yields 1.20% and PH yields 0.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CB or PH more profitable?
- CB runs the higher net margin — CB at 18.48% versus PH at 16.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, CB or PH?
- Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — CB at 12.13% versus PH at 25.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Chubb P/E ratioParker-Hannifin P/E ratioChubb dividend yieldParker-Hannifin dividend yieldChubb ROEParker-Hannifin ROEChubb operating marginParker-Hannifin operating marginChubb revenue growthParker-Hannifin revenue growthChubb free cash flowParker-Hannifin free cash flow
Chubb & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.