Chubb Limited (CB) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
CB leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Chubb Limited and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CB
Chubb Limited
$328.14Financial Services
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Total return — CB vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 30yCB +2093.4%MNST +570249.0%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CB MNST
CB vs MNST: by the numbers
- •CB is the larger company ($127.27B vs $90.79B market cap).
- •CB trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.59 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 18.48% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 9.76% CAGR).
- •CB pays a dividend (1.20% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CB or MNST?
Metric tally: CB 7 · MNST 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCB(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.59● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 12.11● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 2.12● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 1.75● | 10.51 |
| PEG ratio | 0.93● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | CB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.20% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 18.61% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 18.48% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 15.31% | 23.28%● |
| ROIC | 7.95% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | — |
| Payout ratio | 15.17% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.76% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.08%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.27%● | 14.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CB or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: CB (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CB leads 7 to 6.
- Is CB or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CB is cheaper: CB trades at a 11.59 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, CB or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — CB at a 9.76% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does CB or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- CB pays a dividend (1.20% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is CB or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — CB at 18.48% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, CB or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — CB at 12.13% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Chubb P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioChubb dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldChubb ROEMonster Beverage ROEChubb operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginChubb revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthChubb free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Chubb & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.