Chubb Limited (CB) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
CB leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Chubb Limited and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CB
Chubb Limited
$328.14Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — CB vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 30yCB +2080.3%MMC +975.0%CB compounded faster
CB MMC
CB vs MMC: by the numbers
- •CB is the larger company ($127.27B vs $89.82B market cap).
- •CB trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.59 vs 20.30 P/E).
- •CB converts more revenue to profit (18.48% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •CB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.76% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 1.20%).
Which is better, CB or MMC?
Metric tally: CB 10 · MMC 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCB(lower P/E)
GrowthCB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CB | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.59● | 20.30 |
| Forward P/E | 12.11● | 16.60 |
| P/S ratio | 2.12● | 3.11 |
| P/B ratio | 1.75● | 5.48 |
| PEG ratio | 0.93● | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | CB | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.20%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 18.61% | 21.70%● |
| Net margin | 18.48%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 15.31% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 7.95% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CB | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 15.17% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CB | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.76%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.08%● | 16.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.27%● | 10.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CB or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: CB (lower P/E); growth: CB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CB leads 10 to 4.
- Is CB or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CB is cheaper: CB trades at a 11.59 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, CB or MMC?
- Over the past five years, CB grew revenue faster — CB at a 9.76% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does CB or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- CB yields 1.20% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CB or MMC more profitable?
- CB runs the higher net margin — CB at 18.48% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, CB or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, MMC delivered the higher annualized total return — CB at 12.13% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Chubb P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioChubb dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldChubb ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEChubb operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginChubb revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthChubb free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Chubb & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.