Chubb Limited (CB) vs Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)
CB leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Chubb Limited and Lockheed Martin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CB
Chubb Limited
$328.14Financial Services
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$540.33Industrials
Total return — CB vs LMT
growth of $100 · last 30yCB +2093.4%LMT +1192.3%CB compounded faster
CB LMT
CB vs LMT: by the numbers
- •CB is the larger company ($127.27B vs $124.58B market cap).
- •CB trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.59 vs 26.17 P/E).
- •CB converts more revenue to profit (18.48% vs 6.38% net margin).
- •CB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.76% vs 2.62% CAGR).
- •LMT pays the higher dividend yield (2.53% vs 1.20%).
Which is better, CB or LMT?
Metric tally: CB 9 · LMT 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCB(lower P/E)
GrowthCB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLMT(higher dividend yield)
QualityLMT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CB | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.59● | 26.17 |
| Forward P/E | 12.11● | 16.87 |
| P/S ratio | 2.12 | 1.66● |
| P/B ratio | 1.75● | 16.67 |
| PEG ratio | 0.93 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.97 |
| FCF yield | — | 4.54% |
Profitability
| Metric | CB | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.20%● | 9.82% |
| Operating margin | 18.61%● | 9.88% |
| Net margin | 18.48%● | 6.38% |
| ROE | 15.31% | 64.00%● |
| ROIC | 7.95% | 17.39%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CB | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 2.53%● |
| Payout ratio | 15.17% | 63.31% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CB | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.76%● | 2.62% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.08%● | -2.44% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -0.69% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.27%● | 9.78% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CB or LMT?
- It depends on your goal. value: CB (lower P/E); growth: CB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LMT (higher dividend yield); quality: LMT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CB leads 9 to 4.
- Is CB or LMT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CB is cheaper: CB trades at a 11.59 P/E and LMT at 26.17.
- Which has grown faster, CB or LMT?
- Over the past five years, CB grew revenue faster — CB at a 9.76% CAGR versus LMT at 2.62%.
- Does CB or LMT pay a bigger dividend?
- CB yields 1.20% and LMT yields 2.53% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CB or LMT more profitable?
- CB runs the higher net margin — CB at 18.48% versus LMT at 6.38%.
- Which has been the better investment, CB or LMT?
- Over the past 10-year, CB delivered the higher annualized total return — CB at 12.13% versus LMT at 11.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Chubb P/E ratioLockheed Martin P/E ratioChubb dividend yieldLockheed Martin dividend yieldChubb ROELockheed Martin ROEChubb operating marginLockheed Martin operating marginChubb revenue growthLockheed Martin revenue growthChubb free cash flowLockheed Martin free cash flow
Chubb & Lockheed Martin appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.