Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO)
CAMT leads on 4 of 7 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Camtek Ltd. and Klaviyo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CAMT vs KVYO
growth of $100 · last 3yCAMT +150.3%KVYO -49.3%CAMT compounded faster
CAMT KVYO
CAMT vs KVYO: by the numbers
- •CAMT is the larger company ($6.78B vs $5.13B market cap).
- •CAMT is profitable (9.63% net margin) while KVYO runs a net loss (-0.66%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CAMT | KVYO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 171.01 | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.58 |
| P/S ratio | 14.99 | 3.87● |
| P/B ratio | 10.96 | 4.40● |
| PEG ratio | 11.34 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 63.29 | — |
| FCF yield | — | 4.41% |
Profitability
| Metric | CAMT | KVYO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.23% | 74.55%● |
| Operating margin | 24.60%● | -3.22% |
| Net margin | 9.63%● | -0.66% |
| ROE | 7.04%● | -0.75% |
| ROIC | 10.78%● | -5.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CAMT | KVYO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.22% | — |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.08% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 21.78% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 33.25% | — |
Frequently asked
- Is CAMT or KVYO more profitable?
- CAMT runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 9.63% versus KVYO at -0.66%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Camtek P/E ratioKlaviyo P/E ratioCamtek dividend yieldKlaviyo dividend yieldCamtek ROEKlaviyo ROECamtek operating marginKlaviyo operating marginCamtek revenue growthKlaviyo revenue growthCamtek free cash flowKlaviyo free cash flow
Camtek & Klaviyo appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.