Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs Zoetis Inc. (ZTS)
ZTS leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cardinal Health, Inc. and Zoetis Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CAH vs ZTS
growth of $100 · last 13yCAH +411.0%ZTS +156.6%CAH compounded faster
CAH ZTS
CAH vs ZTS: by the numbers
- •CAH is the larger company ($52.43B vs $33.36B market cap).
- •ZTS trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.20 vs 34.23 P/E).
- •ZTS converts more revenue to profit (27.79% vs 0.62% net margin).
- •CAH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.86% vs 6.28% CAGR).
- •ZTS pays the higher dividend yield (2.59% vs 0.91%).
Which is better, CAH or ZTS?
Metric tally: CAH 6 · ZTS 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueZTS(lower P/E)
GrowthCAH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeZTS(higher dividend yield)
QualityZTS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CAH | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.23 | 13.20● |
| Forward P/E | 18.64 | 10.75● |
| P/S ratio | 0.21● | 3.53 |
| P/B ratio | — | 10.40 |
| PEG ratio | 0.30● | 2.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.10 | 10.15● |
| FCF yield | 8.31%● | 6.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | CAH | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 3.68% | 70.75%● |
| Operating margin | 0.92% | 37.57%● |
| Net margin | 0.62% | 27.79%● |
| ROE | -56.13% | 81.75%● |
| ROIC | 11.37% | 21.54%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CAH | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 2.59%● |
| Payout ratio | 31.52% | 34.16% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CAH | ZTS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.86%● | 6.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 6.11% | 11.88%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.47%● | 4.90% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 33.46%● | -14.40% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CAH or ZTS?
- It depends on your goal. value: ZTS (lower P/E); growth: CAH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ZTS (higher dividend yield); quality: ZTS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ZTS leads 10 to 6.
- Is CAH or ZTS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ZTS is cheaper: CAH trades at a 34.23 P/E and ZTS at 13.20.
- Which has grown faster, CAH or ZTS?
- Over the past five years, CAH grew revenue faster — CAH at a 9.86% CAGR versus ZTS at 6.28%.
- Does CAH or ZTS pay a bigger dividend?
- CAH yields 0.91% and ZTS yields 2.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CAH or ZTS more profitable?
- ZTS runs the higher net margin — CAH at 0.62% versus ZTS at 27.79%.
- Which has been the better investment, CAH or ZTS?
- Over the past 10-year, CAH delivered the higher annualized total return — CAH at 14.21% versus ZTS at 6.19%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cardinal Health P/E ratioZoetis P/E ratioCardinal Health dividend yieldZoetis dividend yieldCardinal Health ROEZoetis ROECardinal Health operating marginZoetis operating marginCardinal Health revenue growthZoetis revenue growthCardinal Health free cash flowZoetis free cash flow
Cardinal Health & Zoetis appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.