Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
CAG and SIMO are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Conagra Brands, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
$14.78Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CAG vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yCAG +74.4%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CAG SIMO
CAG vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.07B market cap).
- •SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while CAG runs a net loss (-16.99%).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs -0.55% CAGR).
- •CAG pays the higher dividend yield (9.47% vs 0.74%).
Which is better, CAG or SIMO?
Metric tally: CAG 7 · SIMO 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCAG(higher dividend yield)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CAG | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | 8.72● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 0.63● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 1.11● | 2.74 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.53● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | 13.83%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | CAG | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.92% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | -14.43% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | -16.99% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | -30.14% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | -10.93% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CAG | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 9.47%● | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CAG | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.55% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 44.85% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.35%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -11.09% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CAG or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CAG (higher dividend yield); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Which has grown faster, CAG or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — CAG at a -0.55% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does CAG or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- CAG yields 9.47% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CAG or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — CAG at -16.99% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, CAG or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — CAG at -5.11% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Conagra Brands P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioConagra Brands dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldConagra Brands ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEConagra Brands operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginConagra Brands revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthConagra Brands free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Conagra Brands & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.