Is BYRN or EPAC cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BYRN is cheaper: BYRN trades at a 15.49 P/E and EPAC at 23.17.

Which has grown faster, BYRN or EPAC?

Over the past five years, BYRN grew revenue faster — BYRN at a 36.74% CAGR versus EPAC at 6.64%.

Does BYRN or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while BYRN does not currently pay one.

Is BYRN or EPAC more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — BYRN at 7.30% versus EPAC at 13.69%.

Which has been the better investment, BYRN or EPAC?

Over the past 10-year, BYRN delivered the higher annualized total return — BYRN at 8.88% versus EPAC at 5.15%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)

BYRN leads on 6 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Byrna Technologies Inc. and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BYRN

Byrna Technologies Inc.

$127M

$5.62Industrials

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.96B

$37.07Industrials

Total return — BYRN vs EPAC

growth of $100 · last 20y

BYRN +87.3%EPAC +67.5%BYRN compounded faster

BYRN EPAC

BYRN vs EPAC: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.96B vs $127M market cap).
•BYRN trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 23.17 P/E).
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 7.30% net margin).
•BYRN grew revenue faster over the past five years (36.74% vs 6.64% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while BYRN does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BYRN or EPAC?

Metric tally: BYRN 6 · EPAC 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBYRN(lower P/E)

GrowthBYRN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BYRN	EPAC
P/E ratio	15.49●	23.17
Forward P/E	—	19.56
P/S ratio	1.11●	3.13
P/B ratio	2.01●	4.80
PEG ratio	—	2.78
EV / EBITDA	9.86●	14.68
FCF yield	—	5.65%

Profitability

Metric	BYRN	EPAC
Gross margin	60.30%●	48.58%
Operating margin	9.43%	20.52%●
Net margin	7.30%	13.69%●
ROE	13.28%	21.00%●
ROIC	14.34%	15.12%●

Dividends

Metric	BYRN	EPAC
Dividend yield	—	0.11%
Payout ratio	—	2.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BYRN	EPAC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	36.74%●	6.64%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	169.53%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	31.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-24.38%	8.00%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BYRN or EPAC?: It depends on your goal. value: BYRN (lower P/E); growth: BYRN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BYRN leads 6 to 5.
Is BYRN or EPAC cheaper?: On trailing earnings, BYRN is cheaper: BYRN trades at a 15.49 P/E and EPAC at 23.17.
Which has grown faster, BYRN or EPAC?: Over the past five years, BYRN grew revenue faster — BYRN at a 36.74% CAGR versus EPAC at 6.64%.
Does BYRN or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while BYRN does not currently pay one.
Is BYRN or EPAC more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — BYRN at 7.30% versus EPAC at 13.69%.
Which has been the better investment, BYRN or EPAC?: Over the past 10-year, BYRN delivered the higher annualized total return — BYRN at 8.88% versus EPAC at 5.15%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BYRN analysis Full EPAC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Byrna Technologies P/E ratio Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Byrna Technologies dividend yield Enerpac Tool dividend yield Byrna Technologies ROE Enerpac Tool ROE Byrna Technologies operating margin Enerpac Tool operating margin Byrna Technologies revenue growth Enerpac Tool revenue growth Byrna Technologies free cash flow Enerpac Tool free cash flow

Byrna Technologies & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.