BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
SNA leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BWXT vs SNA
growth of $100 · last 16yBWXT +1355.4%SNA +839.4%BWXT compounded faster
BWXT SNA
BWXT vs SNA: by the numbers
- •SNA is the larger company ($20.77B vs $19.14B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 54.69 P/E).
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 10.21% net margin).
- •BWXT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.87% vs 5.87% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.36% vs 0.51%).
Which is better, BWXT or SNA?
Metric tally: BWXT 4 · SNA 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSNA(lower P/E)
GrowthBWXT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSNA(higher dividend yield)
QualitySNA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BWXT | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 54.69 | 20.71● |
| Forward P/E | 39.36 | 20.98● |
| P/S ratio | 5.60 | 4.13● |
| P/B ratio | 14.76 | 3.55● |
| PEG ratio | 2.84 | 1.87● |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.87 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 1.74% | 5.10%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BWXT | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 22.63% | 51.30%● |
| Operating margin | 10.42% | 24.71%● |
| Net margin | 10.21% | 19.99%● |
| ROE | 26.92%● | 17.18% |
| ROIC | 7.42% | 13.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BWXT | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 2.36%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.89% | 48.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BWXT | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.87%● | 5.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.28% | 11.05%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 104.80%● | 0.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 30.20%● | 15.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BWXT or SNA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: BWXT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SNA (higher dividend yield); quality: SNA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 13 to 4.
- Is BWXT or SNA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: BWXT trades at a 54.69 P/E and SNA at 20.71.
- Which has grown faster, BWXT or SNA?
- Over the past five years, BWXT grew revenue faster — BWXT at a 9.87% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
- Does BWXT or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- BWXT yields 0.51% and SNA yields 2.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BWXT or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — BWXT at 10.21% versus SNA at 19.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, BWXT or SNA?
- Over the past 10-year, BWXT delivered the higher annualized total return — BWXT at 20.93% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BWX Technologies P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioBWX Technologies dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldBWX Technologies ROESnap-on ROEBWX Technologies operating marginSnap-on operating marginBWX Technologies revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthBWX Technologies free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
BWX Technologies & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.