Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BN
Brookfield Corporation
$41.69Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$192.01Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BN vs MRSH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBN +283.5% (+14.4%/yr)MRSH +238.1% (+13.0%/yr)BN compounded faster over this window
BN MRSH
BN vs MRSH: by the numbers
- •BN is the larger company ($93.12B vs $91.63B market cap).
- •MRSH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.47 vs 74.75 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MRSH converts more revenue to profit (14.24% vs 1.82% net margin).
- •MRSH grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.62% vs 2.71% CAGR).
- •MRSH pays the higher dividend yield (1.92% vs 0.62%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BN | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 74.75 | 23.47 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 18.38 |
| P/S ratio | 1.27 | 3.33 |
| P/B ratio | 2.12 | 6.12 |
Profitability
| Metric | BN | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.80% | 42.38% |
| Operating margin | 28.56% | 21.62% |
| Net margin | 1.82% | 14.24% |
| ROE | 3.04% | 26.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | BN | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.92% |
| Payout ratio | 52.00% | 43.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BN | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.71% | 8.62% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 16.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.74% | 5.99% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BN or MRSH?
- MRSH has the lower trailing P/E: BN trades at 74.75 and MRSH at 23.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BN or MRSH?
- Over the past five years, MRSH grew revenue faster — BN at a 2.71% CAGR versus MRSH at 8.62%.
- Does BN or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?
- BN yields 0.62% and MRSH yields 1.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BN or MRSH more profitable?
- MRSH runs the higher net margin — BN at 1.82% versus MRSH at 14.24%.
- How have BN and MRSH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BN delivered 14.38% and MRSH delivered 12.97% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Brookfield P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioBrookfield dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldBrookfield ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEBrookfield operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginBrookfield revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growth
Brookfield & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.