Is BN or MRSH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MRSH is cheaper: BN trades at a 83.12 P/E and MRSH at 22.38.

Which has grown faster, BN or MRSH?

Over the past five years, MRSH grew revenue faster — BN at a 4.12% CAGR versus MRSH at 9.28%.

Does BN or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?

BN yields 0.65% and MRSH yields 2.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BN or MRSH more profitable?

MRSH runs the higher net margin — BN at 1.74% versus MRSH at 14.26%.

Which has been the better investment, BN or MRSH?

Over the past 10-year, BN delivered the higher annualized total return — BN at 14.80% versus MRSH at 12.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)

MRSH leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Brookfield Corporation

$96.25B

$43.09Financial Services

MRSH

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

$86.24B

$179.00Financial Services

Total return — BN vs MRSH

growth of $100 · last 30y

BN +5684.1%MRSH +1061.2%BN compounded faster

BN MRSH

BN vs MRSH: by the numbers

•BN is the larger company ($96.25B vs $86.24B market cap).
•MRSH trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.38 vs 83.12 P/E).
•MRSH converts more revenue to profit (14.26% vs 1.74% net margin).
•MRSH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.28% vs 4.12% CAGR).
•MRSH pays the higher dividend yield (2.01% vs 0.65%).

Which is better, BN or MRSH?

Metric tally: BN 5 · MRSH 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMRSH(lower P/E)

GrowthMRSH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMRSH(higher dividend yield)

QualityMRSH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BN	MRSH
P/E ratio	83.12	22.38●
Forward P/E	—	17.23
P/S ratio	1.33●	3.16
P/B ratio	2.16●	5.97
PEG ratio	0.58●	7.85

Profitability

Metric	BN	MRSH
Gross margin	35.28%	42.37%●
Operating margin	28.32%●	21.70%
Net margin	1.74%	14.26%●
ROE	2.84%	26.94%●
ROIC	3.19%	12.12%●

Dividends

Metric	BN	MRSH
Dividend yield	0.65%	2.01%●
Payout ratio	53.85%	42.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BN	MRSH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.12%	9.28%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-12.76%	16.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.52%●	6.42%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BN or MRSH?: It depends on your goal. value: MRSH (lower P/E); growth: MRSH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MRSH (higher dividend yield); quality: MRSH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MRSH leads 8 to 5.
Is BN or MRSH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MRSH is cheaper: BN trades at a 83.12 P/E and MRSH at 22.38.
Which has grown faster, BN or MRSH?: Over the past five years, MRSH grew revenue faster — BN at a 4.12% CAGR versus MRSH at 9.28%.
Does BN or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?: BN yields 0.65% and MRSH yields 2.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BN or MRSH more profitable?: MRSH runs the higher net margin — BN at 1.74% versus MRSH at 14.26%.
Which has been the better investment, BN or MRSH?: Over the past 10-year, BN delivered the higher annualized total return — BN at 14.80% versus MRSH at 12.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BN analysis Full MRSH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Brookfield P/E ratio Marsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratio Brookfield dividend yield Marsh & McLennan Companies dividend yield Brookfield ROE Marsh & McLennan Companies ROE Brookfield operating margin Marsh & McLennan Companies operating margin Brookfield revenue growth Marsh & McLennan Companies revenue growth Brookfield free cash flow Marsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow

Brookfield & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.