Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) vs Cigna Corporation (CI)
CI leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cigna Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BMY vs CI
growth of $100 · last 30yBMY +171.1%CI +2316.9%CI compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BMY CI
BMY vs CI: by the numbers
- •BMY is the larger company ($116.66B vs $78.83B market cap).
- •CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.64 vs 16.05 P/E).
- •BMY converts more revenue to profit (15.01% vs 2.26% net margin).
- •CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 2.52% CAGR).
- •BMY pays the higher dividend yield (4.38% vs 2.06%).
Which is better, BMY or CI?
Metric tally: BMY 8 · CI 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCI(lower P/E)
GrowthCI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBMY(higher dividend yield)
QualityBMY(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BMY | CI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.05 | 12.64● |
| Forward P/E | 9.31 | 8.91● |
| P/S ratio | 2.41 | 0.28● |
| P/B ratio | 5.82 | 1.87● |
| PEG ratio | 1.71 | 0.15● |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.03 | 8.41● |
| FCF yield | 10.20%● | 9.73% |
Profitability
| Metric | BMY | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.75%● | 9.30% |
| Operating margin | 25.67%● | 3.42% |
| Net margin | 15.01%● | 2.26% |
| ROE | 36.25%● | 14.90% |
| ROIC | 13.90%● | 7.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | BMY | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.38%● | 2.06% |
| Payout ratio | 72.25% | 27.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BMY | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.52% | 11.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.38%● | -0.76% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | -2.03%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.74% | 6.19%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BMY or CI?
- It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); growth: CI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BMY (higher dividend yield); quality: BMY (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 9 to 8.
- Is BMY or CI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: BMY trades at a 16.05 P/E and CI at 12.64.
- Which has grown faster, BMY or CI?
- Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — BMY at a 2.52% CAGR versus CI at 11.28%.
- Does BMY or CI pay a bigger dividend?
- BMY yields 4.38% and CI yields 2.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BMY or CI more profitable?
- BMY runs the higher net margin — BMY at 15.01% versus CI at 2.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, BMY or CI?
- Over the past 10-year, CI delivered the higher annualized total return — BMY at 1.08% versus CI at 9.91%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bristol-Myers Squibb P/E ratioCigna P/E ratioBristol-Myers Squibb dividend yieldCigna dividend yieldBristol-Myers Squibb ROECigna ROEBristol-Myers Squibb operating marginCigna operating marginBristol-Myers Squibb revenue growthCigna revenue growthBristol-Myers Squibb free cash flowCigna free cash flow
Bristol-Myers Squibb & Cigna appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.