Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BMNR
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
$15.79Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BMNR vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yBMNR -100.0%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BMNR SIMO
BMNR vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $8.99B market cap).
- •SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while BMNR runs a net loss (-14306.56%).
- •BMNR grew revenue faster over the past five years (446.74% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays the higher dividend yield (0.74% vs 0.06%).
Which is better, BMNR or SIMO?
Metric tally: BMNR 4 · SIMO 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthBMNR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSIMO(higher dividend yield)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BMNR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 142.38 | 2.57● |
| P/B ratio | 0.75● | 2.74 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | BMNR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.09% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 7288.12%● | 12.77% |
| Net margin | -14306.56% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | -75.47% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 4.00% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BMNR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | 0.74%● |
| Payout ratio | 0.74% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BMNR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 446.74%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 112.02%● | 44.85% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.00% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BMNR or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. growth: BMNR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SIMO (higher dividend yield); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 7 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, BMNR or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, BMNR grew revenue faster — BMNR at a 446.74% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does BMNR or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- BMNR yields 0.06% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BMNR or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — BMNR at -14306.56% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, BMNR or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — BMNR at -0.87% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bitmine Immersion Technologies P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioBitmine Immersion Technologies dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldBitmine Immersion Technologies ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEBitmine Immersion Technologies operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginBitmine Immersion Technologies revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthBitmine Immersion Technologies free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Bitmine Immersion Technologies & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.