Baker Hughes Co (BKR) vs Cameco Corporation (CCJ)
BKR leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Baker Hughes Co and Cameco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BKR vs CCJ
growth of $100 · last 30yBKR +167.2%CCJ +1312.3%CCJ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BKR CCJ
BKR vs CCJ: by the numbers
- •BKR is the larger company ($55.93B vs $47.43B market cap).
- •BKR trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.01 vs 99.55 P/E).
- •CCJ converts more revenue to profit (18.49% vs 11.17% net margin).
- •CCJ grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.99% vs 6.81% CAGR).
- •BKR pays the higher dividend yield (1.63% vs 0.16%).
Which is better, BKR or CCJ?
Metric tally: BKR 11 · CCJ 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBKR(lower P/E)
GrowthCCJ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBKR(higher dividend yield)
QualityBKR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.01● | 99.55 |
| Forward P/E | 19.70● | 41.13 |
| P/S ratio | 2.01● | 18.48 |
| P/B ratio | 2.91● | 12.99 |
| PEG ratio | 0.36● | 0.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.28● | 54.38 |
| FCF yield | 4.08%● | 1.39% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.57% | 29.79%● |
| Operating margin | 12.96% | 16.59%● |
| Net margin | 11.17% | 18.49%● |
| ROE | 16.13%● | 13.00% |
| ROIC | 11.64%● | 4.77% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.63%● | 0.16% |
| Payout ratio | 35.11% | 17.49% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKR | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.81% | 13.99%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.99%● | 37.38% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.74% | 26.83%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.95% | 41.12%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BKR or CCJ?
- It depends on your goal. value: BKR (lower P/E); growth: CCJ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BKR (higher dividend yield); quality: BKR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKR leads 11 to 6.
- Is BKR or CCJ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BKR is cheaper: BKR trades at a 18.01 P/E and CCJ at 99.55.
- Which has grown faster, BKR or CCJ?
- Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.81% CAGR versus CCJ at 13.99%.
- Does BKR or CCJ pay a bigger dividend?
- BKR yields 1.63% and CCJ yields 0.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKR or CCJ more profitable?
- CCJ runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus CCJ at 18.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, BKR or CCJ?
- Over the past 10-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — BKR at 8.73% versus CCJ at 26.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Baker Hughes P/E ratioCameco P/E ratioBaker Hughes dividend yieldCameco dividend yieldBaker Hughes ROECameco ROEBaker Hughes operating marginCameco operating marginBaker Hughes revenue growthCameco revenue growthBaker Hughes free cash flowCameco free cash flow
Baker Hughes & Cameco appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.