Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKR or CCJ?

BKR has the lower trailing P/E: BKR trades at 20.05 and CCJ at 173.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BKR or CCJ?

Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.26% CAGR versus CCJ at 15.08%.

Does BKR or CCJ pay a bigger dividend?

BKR yields 1.48% and CCJ yields 0.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BKR or CCJ more profitable?

BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus CCJ at 10.29%.

How have BKR and CCJ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BKR delivered 8.13% and CCJ delivered 27.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Cameco Corporation (CCJ)

A side-by-side comparison of Baker Hughes Company and Cameco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BKR

Baker Hughes Company

$61.88B

$62.34EnergyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

CCJ

Cameco Corporation

$44.65B

$102.51EnergyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — BKR vs CCJ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BKR +134.6% (+8.9%/yr)CCJ +1102.7% (+28.2%/yr)CCJ compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BKR CCJ

BKR vs CCJ: by the numbers

•BKR is the larger company ($61.88B vs $44.65B market cap).
•BKR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.05 vs 173.40 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BKR converts more revenue to profit (11.17% vs 10.29% net margin).
•CCJ grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.08% vs 6.26% CAGR).
•BKR pays the higher dividend yield (1.48% vs 0.17%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BKR	CCJ
P/E ratio	20.05	173.40
Forward P/E	23.77	66.41
P/S ratio	2.24	17.89
P/B ratio	3.12	8.89
EV / EBITDA	12.84	76.44
FCF yield	5.04%	0.87%

Profitability

Metric	BKR	CCJ
Gross margin	23.57%	27.91%
Operating margin	12.92%	14.57%
Net margin	11.17%	10.29%
ROE	15.56%	5.11%
ROIC	9.23%	4.10%

Dividends

Metric	BKR	CCJ
Dividend yield	1.48%	0.17%
Payout ratio	35.11%	17.49%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BKR	CCJ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.26%	15.08%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	49.99%	37.38%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.27%	16.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	27.87%	45.12%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKR or CCJ?: BKR has the lower trailing P/E: BKR trades at 20.05 and CCJ at 173.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BKR or CCJ?: Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.26% CAGR versus CCJ at 15.08%.
Does BKR or CCJ pay a bigger dividend?: BKR yields 1.48% and CCJ yields 0.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BKR or CCJ more profitable?: BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus CCJ at 10.29%.
How have BKR and CCJ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BKR delivered 8.13% and CCJ delivered 27.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BKR analysis Full CCJ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Baker Hughes P/E ratio Cameco P/E ratio Baker Hughes dividend yield Cameco dividend yield Baker Hughes ROE Cameco ROE Baker Hughes operating margin Cameco operating margin Baker Hughes revenue growth Cameco revenue growth Baker Hughes free cash flow Cameco free cash flow

Baker Hughes & Cameco appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.