The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
BK leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
$146.44Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — BK vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 30yBK +795.7%MMC +959.7%MMC compounded faster
BK MMC
BK vs MMC: by the numbers
- •BK is the larger company ($97.40B vs $89.82B market cap).
- •BK trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.15 vs 20.30 P/E).
- •BK converts more revenue to profit (14.66% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •BK grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.87% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 1.45%).
Which is better, BK or MMC?
Metric tally: BK 8 · MMC 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBK(lower P/E)
GrowthBK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BK | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.15● | 20.30 |
| Forward P/E | 16.68 | 16.60 |
| P/S ratio | 2.51● | 3.11 |
| P/B ratio | 2.28● | 5.48 |
| PEG ratio | 0.56● | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | BK | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.52%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 18.58% | 21.70%● |
| Net margin | 14.66%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 13.31% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 6.38% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BK | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.42% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BK | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.87%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.21% | 16.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 27.74%● | 10.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BK or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: BK (lower P/E); growth: BK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BK leads 8 to 5.
- Is BK or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BK is cheaper: BK trades at a 18.15 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, BK or MMC?
- Over the past five years, BK grew revenue faster — BK at a 20.87% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does BK or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- BK yields 1.45% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BK or MMC more profitable?
- BK runs the higher net margin — BK at 14.66% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, BK or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, BK delivered the higher annualized total return — BK at 16.63% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bank of New York Mellon P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioBank of New York Mellon dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldBank of New York Mellon ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEBank of New York Mellon operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginBank of New York Mellon revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthBank of New York Mellon free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Bank of New York Mellon & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.