BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust (BIT) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
BIT leads on 11 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BIT
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust
$12.34Financial Services
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.00Financial Services
Total return — BIT vs NMS
growth of $100 · last 12yBIT -30.4%NMS -20.0%NMS compounded faster
BIT NMS
BIT vs NMS: by the numbers
- •BIT is the larger company ($530M vs $75M market cap).
- •BIT trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.13 vs 11.21 P/E).
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (87.52% vs 84.98% net margin).
- •BIT grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.07% vs -7.24% CAGR).
- •BIT pays the higher dividend yield (12.03% vs 6.30%).
Which is better, BIT or NMS?
Metric tally: BIT 11 · NMS 1It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBIT(lower P/E)
GrowthBIT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBIT(higher dividend yield)
QualityBIT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BIT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 7.13● | 11.21 |
| P/S ratio | 7.67● | 9.91 |
| P/B ratio | 0.89● | 1.00 |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.28 |
Profitability
| Metric | BIT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 83.53%● | -4.36% |
| Operating margin | 114.70%● | -12.54% |
| Net margin | 84.98% | 87.52%● |
| ROE | 9.82%● | 8.85% |
| ROIC | 5.98%● | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | BIT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 12.03%● | 6.30% |
| Payout ratio | 140.04% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BIT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.07%● | -7.24% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -10.31%● | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.72%● | -0.65% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BIT or NMS?
- It depends on your goal. value: BIT (lower P/E); growth: BIT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BIT (higher dividend yield); quality: BIT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BIT leads 11 to 1.
- Is BIT or NMS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BIT is cheaper: BIT trades at a 7.13 P/E and NMS at 11.21.
- Which has grown faster, BIT or NMS?
- Over the past five years, BIT grew revenue faster — BIT at a 2.07% CAGR versus NMS at -7.24%.
- Does BIT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- BIT yields 12.03% and NMS yields 6.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BIT or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — BIT at 84.98% versus NMS at 87.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, BIT or NMS?
- Over the past 10-year, BIT delivered the higher annualized total return — BIT at 7.01% versus NMS at 1.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioBlackRock Multi-Sector Income dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldBlackRock Multi-Sector Income ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEBlackRock Multi-Sector Income operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginBlackRock Multi-Sector Income revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthBlackRock Multi-Sector Income free cash flowNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.