Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BIO
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
$314.46HealthcareAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BIO vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yBIO +429.5%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BIO SIMO
BIO vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $8.50B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 51.81 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 6.52% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 0.29% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while BIO does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BIO or SIMO?
Metric tally: BIO 4 · SIMO 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BIO | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 51.81 | 21.10● |
| Forward P/E | 34.78 | 30.51● |
| P/S ratio | 3.27 | 2.57● |
| P/B ratio | 1.24● | 2.74 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.36 | 16.83● |
| FCF yield | 4.21%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | BIO | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.87%● | 48.09% |
| Operating margin | 9.25% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 6.52% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 2.46% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 2.04% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BIO | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BIO | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.29% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -26.27% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -7.57%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -14.36% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BIO or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 11 to 4.
- Is BIO or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: BIO trades at a 51.81 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, BIO or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — BIO at a 0.29% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does BIO or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while BIO does not currently pay one.
- Is BIO or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — BIO at 6.52% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, BIO or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — BIO at 8.20% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bio-Rad Laboratories P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioBio-Rad Laboratories dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldBio-Rad Laboratories ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEBio-Rad Laboratories operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginBio-Rad Laboratories revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthBio-Rad Laboratories free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Bio-Rad Laboratories & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.