BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs ZVZZT (ZVZZT)

Over the past 10 years, BGT outperformed ZVZZT — 6.46% vs 4.06% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and ZVZZT across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total returnBGT vs ZVZZT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 20y
BGT +159.3%ZVZZT -93.3%BGT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
0001101001k10k100kStart $10020082012201620202024$259$7
BGT ZVZZT

Metrics side by side

Did BGT beat ZVZZT?

Over the past 10 years, BGT outperformed ZVZZT — 6.46% vs 4.06% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricBGTZVZZT
Total return (1Y)-2.40%140.29%
Total return CAGR (3Y)9.34%38.80%
Total return CAGR (5Y)6.98%21.74%
Total return CAGR (10Y)6.46%4.06%

ZVZZT is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has BGT beaten ZVZZT?
Over the past 10 years, BGT outperformed ZVZZT — 6.46% vs 4.06% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.