Which has grown faster, BGT or NNDM?

Over the past five years, NNDM grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus NNDM at 101.92%.

Does BGT or NNDM pay a bigger dividend?

BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while NNDM does not currently pay one.

Is BGT or NNDM more profitable?

BGT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus NNDM at -286.76%.

Which has been the better investment, BGT or NNDM?

Over the past 10-year, BGT delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.46% versus NNDM at -32.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM)

BGT leads on 6 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Nano Dimension Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BGT

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust

$322M

$10.79Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

NNDM

Nano Dimension Ltd.

$309M

$1.47TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — BGT vs NNDM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 11y

BGT +101.2%NNDM -98.2%BGT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BGT NNDM

BGT vs NNDM: by the numbers

•BGT is the larger company ($322M vs $309M market cap).
•BGT is profitable (71.60% net margin) while NNDM runs a net loss (-286.76%).
•NNDM grew revenue faster over the past five years (101.92% vs 9.30% CAGR).
•BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while NNDM does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BGT or NNDM?

Metric tally: BGT 6 · NNDM 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthNNDM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBGT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BGT	NNDM
P/E ratio	9.90	—
P/S ratio	7.54	2.59●
P/B ratio	0.82	0.63●
PEG ratio	0.23	—

Profitability

Metric	BGT	NNDM
Gross margin	84.12%●	34.08%
Operating margin	87.84%●	-91.42%
Net margin	71.60%●	-286.76%
ROE	7.75%●	-69.51%
ROIC	4.57%●	-14.27%

Dividends

Metric	BGT	NNDM
Dividend yield	13.38%	—
Payout ratio	197.72%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BGT	NNDM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.30%	101.92%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	43.50%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.98%●	-25.53%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BGT or NNDM?: It depends on your goal. growth: NNDM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BGT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BGT leads 6 to 3.
Which has grown faster, BGT or NNDM?: Over the past five years, NNDM grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus NNDM at 101.92%.
Does BGT or NNDM pay a bigger dividend?: BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while NNDM does not currently pay one.
Is BGT or NNDM more profitable?: BGT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus NNDM at -286.76%.
Which has been the better investment, BGT or NNDM?: Over the past 10-year, BGT delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.46% versus NNDM at -32.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BGT analysis Full NNDM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratio Nano Dimension P/E ratio BlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yield Nano Dimension dividend yield BlackRock Floating Rate Income ROE Nano Dimension ROE BlackRock Floating Rate Income operating margin Nano Dimension operating margin BlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growth Nano Dimension revenue growth BlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flow Nano Dimension free cash flow

BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Nano Dimension appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.