Is BGT or NA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NA is cheaper: BGT trades at a 9.90 P/E and NA at 2.37.

Which has grown faster, BGT or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does BGT or NA pay a bigger dividend?

BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while NA does not currently pay one.

Is BGT or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus NA at 505.49%.

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

NA leads on 5 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BGT

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust

$322M

$10.79Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Nano Labs Ltd

$130M

$1.93TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — BGT vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

BGT +52.7%NA -98.4%BGT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BGT NA

BGT vs NA: by the numbers

•BGT is the larger company ($322M vs $130M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower earnings multiple (2.37 vs 9.90 P/E).
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 71.60% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 9.30% CAGR).
•BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while NA does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BGT or NA?

Metric tally: BGT 4 · NA 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNA(lower P/E)

GrowthNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBGT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BGT	NA
P/E ratio	9.90	2.37●
P/S ratio	7.54●	11.77
P/B ratio	0.82	0.42●
PEG ratio	0.23	—
EV / EBITDA	—	6.56

Profitability

Metric	BGT	NA
Gross margin	84.12%●	-147.33%
Operating margin	87.84%●	-396.84%
Net margin	71.60%	505.49%●
ROE	7.75%	17.96%●
ROIC	4.57%●	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	BGT	NA
Dividend yield	13.38%	—
Payout ratio	197.72%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BGT	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.30%	64.16%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	43.50%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.98%	—

Frequently asked

Which is better, BGT or NA?: It depends on your goal. value: NA (lower P/E); growth: NA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BGT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NA leads 5 to 4.
Is BGT or NA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NA is cheaper: BGT trades at a 9.90 P/E and NA at 2.37.
Which has grown faster, BGT or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does BGT or NA pay a bigger dividend?: BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while NA does not currently pay one.
Is BGT or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full BGT analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio BlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield BlackRock Floating Rate Income ROE Nano Labs ROE BlackRock Floating Rate Income operating margin Nano Labs operating margin BlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth BlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.