BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)
BGT leads on 6 of 9 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.79Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Limited
$1.83Consumer CyclicalAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BGT vs MSC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yBGT +70.3%MSC -88.2%BGT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BGT MSC
BGT vs MSC: by the numbers
- •BGT is the larger company ($322M vs $92M market cap).
- •BGT is profitable (71.60% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
- •MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (77.20% vs 9.30% CAGR).
- •BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BGT or MSC?
Metric tally: BGT 6 · MSC 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthMSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBGT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | MSC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.90 | — |
| P/S ratio | 7.54 | 0.12● |
| P/B ratio | 0.82 | 0.18● |
| PEG ratio | 0.23 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 6.91 |
| FCF yield | — | 41.32% |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.12%● | 68.05% |
| Operating margin | 87.84%● | 11.60% |
| Net margin | 71.60%● | -5.63% |
| ROE | 7.75%● | -7.94% |
| ROIC | 4.57%● | 2.68% |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.38% | — |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30% | 77.20%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.98%● | -27.58% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BGT or MSC?
- It depends on your goal. growth: MSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BGT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BGT leads 6 to 3.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or MSC?
- Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus MSC at 77.20%.
- Does BGT or MSC pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT pays a dividend (13.38% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.
- Is BGT or MSC more profitable?
- BGT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus MSC at -5.63%.
- Which has been the better investment, BGT or MSC?
- Over the past 5-year, BGT delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.46% versus MSC at -27.58%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioStudio City International P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldStudio City International dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROEStudio City International ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginStudio City International operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthStudio City International revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowStudio City International free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Studio City International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.