On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: BG trades at a 26.18 P/E and K at 22.90.

Which has grown faster, BG or K?

Over the past five years, BG grew revenue faster — BG at a 12.25% CAGR versus K at -1.30%.

Does BG or K pay a bigger dividend?

BG yields 2.50% and K yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BG or K more profitable?

K runs the higher net margin — BG at 0.85% versus K at 10.08%.

Which has been the better investment, BG or K?

Over the past 10-year, BG delivered the higher annualized total return — BG at 9.38% versus K at 5.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bunge Global S.A. (BG) vs Kellanova (K)

K leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bunge Global S.A. and Kellanova across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bunge Global S.A.

$21.84B

$112.58Consumer Defensive

Kellanova

$29.03B

$83.44Consumer Defensive

Total return — BG vs K

growth of $100 · last 24y

BG +471.6%K +190.4%BG compounded faster

BG K

BG vs K: by the numbers

•K is the larger company ($29.03B vs $21.84B market cap).
•K trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.90 vs 26.18 P/E).
•K converts more revenue to profit (10.08% vs 0.85% net margin).
•BG grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.25% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•BG pays the higher dividend yield (2.50% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, BG or K?

Metric tally: BG 5 · K 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueK(lower P/E)

GrowthBG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeBG(higher dividend yield)

QualityK(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BG	K
P/E ratio	26.18	22.90●
Forward P/E	12.00●	22.06
P/S ratio	0.27●	2.30
P/B ratio	1.37●	6.95
PEG ratio	—	0.51
EV / EBITDA	15.90	15.66
FCF yield	0.06%	2.05%●

Profitability

Metric	BG	K
Gross margin	5.22%	34.81%●
Operating margin	2.41%	14.61%●
Net margin	0.85%	10.08%●
ROE	4.28%	30.38%●
ROIC	2.24%	12.91%●

Dividends

Metric	BG	K
Dividend yield	2.50%●	1.39%
Payout ratio	56.85%	29.59%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BG	K
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.25%●	-1.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-9.16%	0.30%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-30.92%	-15.22%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.78%	11.22%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BG or K?: It depends on your goal. value: K (lower P/E); growth: BG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BG (higher dividend yield); quality: K (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, K leads 10 to 5.
Is BG or K cheaper?: On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: BG trades at a 26.18 P/E and K at 22.90.
Which has grown faster, BG or K?: Over the past five years, BG grew revenue faster — BG at a 12.25% CAGR versus K at -1.30%.
Does BG or K pay a bigger dividend?: BG yields 2.50% and K yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BG or K more profitable?: K runs the higher net margin — BG at 0.85% versus K at 10.08%.
Which has been the better investment, BG or K?: Over the past 10-year, BG delivered the higher annualized total return — BG at 9.38% versus K at 5.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BG analysis Full K analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bunge Global P/E ratio Kellanova P/E ratio Bunge Global dividend yield Kellanova dividend yield Bunge Global ROE Kellanova ROE Bunge Global operating margin Kellanova operating margin Bunge Global revenue growth Kellanova revenue growth Bunge Global free cash flow Kellanova free cash flow

Bunge Global & Kellanova appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.