Is BEP or ES cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ES is cheaper: BEP trades at a 57.13 P/E and ES at 14.91.

Which has grown faster, BEP or ES?

Over the past five years, BEP grew revenue faster — BEP at a 10.94% CAGR versus ES at 8.29%.

Does BEP or ES pay a bigger dividend?

BEP yields 4.46% and ES yields 4.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BEP or ES more profitable?

ES runs the higher net margin — BEP at 3.01% versus ES at 12.55%.

Which has been the better investment, BEP or ES?

Over the past 10-year, BEP delivered the higher annualized total return — BEP at 13.72% versus ES at 5.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) vs Eversource Energy (ES)

ES leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and Eversource Energy across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BEP

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.

Total return — BEP vs ES

growth of $100 · last 23y

BEP +14.8%ES +285.8%ES compounded faster

BEP ES

BEP vs ES: by the numbers

•ES is the larger company ($26.25B vs $10.40B market cap).
•ES trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.91 vs 57.13 P/E).
•ES converts more revenue to profit (12.55% vs 3.01% net margin).
•BEP grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.94% vs 8.29% CAGR).
•BEP pays the higher dividend yield (4.46% vs 4.41%).

Which is better, BEP or ES?

Metric tally: BEP 4 · ES 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueES(lower P/E)

GrowthBEP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityES(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BEP	ES
P/E ratio	57.13	14.91●
Forward P/E	—	14.14
P/S ratio	1.63●	1.89
P/B ratio	2.47	1.59●
PEG ratio	4.33	0.15●
EV / EBITDA	9.21●	10.00
FCF yield	—	0.90%

Profitability

Metric	BEP	ES
Gross margin	34.36%	39.87%●
Operating margin	11.33%	22.52%●
Net margin	3.01%	12.55%●
ROE	4.56%	10.58%●
ROIC	1.03%	4.68%●

Dividends

Metric	BEP	ES
Dividend yield	4.46%	4.41%
Payout ratio	—	67.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BEP	ES
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.94%●	8.29%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-20.67%	5.08%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-7.80%	20.98%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.25%●	0.77%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BEP or ES?: It depends on your goal. value: ES (lower P/E); growth: BEP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ES (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ES leads 10 to 4.
Is BEP or ES cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ES is cheaper: BEP trades at a 57.13 P/E and ES at 14.91.
Which has grown faster, BEP or ES?: Over the past five years, BEP grew revenue faster — BEP at a 10.94% CAGR versus ES at 8.29%.
Does BEP or ES pay a bigger dividend?: BEP yields 4.46% and ES yields 4.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BEP or ES more profitable?: ES runs the higher net margin — BEP at 3.01% versus ES at 12.55%.
Which has been the better investment, BEP or ES?: Over the past 10-year, BEP delivered the higher annualized total return — BEP at 13.72% versus ES at 5.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BEP analysis Full ES analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. P/E ratio Eversource Energy P/E ratio Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. dividend yield Eversource Energy dividend yield Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. ROE Eversource Energy ROE Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. operating margin Eversource Energy operating margin Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. revenue growth Eversource Energy revenue growth Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. free cash flow Eversource Energy free cash flow

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. & Eversource Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.