Is BEN or RL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BEN is cheaper: BEN trades at a 23.98 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, BEN or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — BEN at a 5.65% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does BEN or RL pay a bigger dividend?

BEN yields 4.05% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BEN or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — BEN at 8.99% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, BEN or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — BEN at 3.97% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

RL leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though BEN is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Resources, Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BEN

Franklin Resources, Inc.

$17.01B

$32.13Financial Services

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — BEN vs RL

growth of $100 · last 29y

BEN +175.6%RL +1182.5%RL compounded faster

BEN RL

BEN vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $17.01B market cap).
•BEN trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.98 vs 26.74 P/E).
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 8.99% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 5.65% CAGR).
•BEN pays the higher dividend yield (4.05% vs 0.90%).

Which is better, BEN or RL?

Metric tally: BEN 6 · RL 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBEN(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeBEN(higher dividend yield)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BEN	RL
P/E ratio	23.98●	26.74
Forward P/E	11.73●	22.03
P/S ratio	1.84●	3.10
P/B ratio	1.37●	8.86
PEG ratio	3.21	0.71●
EV / EBITDA	—	22.22
FCF yield	—	2.96%

Profitability

Metric	BEN	RL
Gross margin	73.80%●	69.87%
Operating margin	9.34%	14.53%●
Net margin	8.99%	11.60%●
ROE	6.70%	33.13%●
ROIC	1.38%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	BEN	RL
Dividend yield	4.05%●	0.90%
Payout ratio	142.86%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BEN	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.65%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-10.56%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	22.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.04%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BEN or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: BEN (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BEN (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 8 to 6.
Is BEN or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, BEN is cheaper: BEN trades at a 23.98 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, BEN or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — BEN at a 5.65% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does BEN or RL pay a bigger dividend?: BEN yields 4.05% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BEN or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — BEN at 8.99% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, BEN or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — BEN at 3.97% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BEN analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Resources P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Franklin Resources dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Franklin Resources ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Franklin Resources operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Franklin Resources revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Franklin Resources free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Franklin Resources & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.