Which has grown faster, BE or WAB?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus WAB at 9.16%.

Does BE or WAB pay a bigger dividend?

WAB pays a dividend (0.38% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or WAB more profitable?

WAB runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus WAB at 10.60%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or WAB?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 58.85% versus WAB at 16.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB)

WAB leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

$52.59B

$184.89IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WAB

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

$51.10B

$302.50IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 24, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs WAB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +769.2%WAB +198.0%BE compounded faster

BE WAB

BE vs WAB: by the numbers

•BE is the larger company ($52.59B vs $51.10B market cap).
•WAB converts more revenue to profit (10.60% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 9.16% CAGR).
•WAB pays a dividend (0.38% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or WAB?

Metric tally: BE 3 · WAB 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityWAB(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	WAB
P/E ratio	—	29.42
Forward P/E	101.25	27.60●
P/S ratio	28.37	4.23●
P/B ratio	75.39	4.51●
PEG ratio	—	2.32
EV / EBITDA	275.06	24.23●
FCF yield	0.34%	3.87%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	WAB
Gross margin	31.11%	34.33%●
Operating margin	8.24%	16.54%●
Net margin	0.25%	10.60%●
ROE	0.65%	11.29%●
ROIC	1.89%	7.64%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	WAB
Dividend yield	—	0.38%
Payout ratio	—	16.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	WAB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	9.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	25.77%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	15.68%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	58.85%●	30.23%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or WAB?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WAB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WAB leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, BE or WAB?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus WAB at 9.16%.
Does BE or WAB pay a bigger dividend?: WAB pays a dividend (0.38% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or WAB more profitable?: WAB runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus WAB at 10.60%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or WAB?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 58.85% versus WAB at 16.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full WAB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 24, 2026.