Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)
LHX leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
$197.06IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$280.55IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BE vs LHX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yBE +706.6%LHX +115.4%BE compounded faster
BE LHX
BE vs LHX: by the numbers
- •BE is the larger company ($56.05B vs $52.27B market cap).
- •LHX converts more revenue to profit (7.71% vs 0.25% net margin).
- •BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 4.38% CAGR).
- •LHX pays a dividend (1.75% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BE or LHX?
Metric tally: BE 4 · LHX 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLHX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BE | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 30.46 |
| Forward P/E | 100.15 | 26.35● |
| P/S ratio | 28.06 | 2.35● |
| P/B ratio | 74.58 | 2.68● |
| PEG ratio | — | 4.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 272.11 | 18.49● |
| FCF yield | 0.34% | 4.90%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BE | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.11%● | 25.26% |
| Operating margin | 8.24% | 9.93%● |
| Net margin | 0.25% | 7.71%● |
| ROE | 0.65% | 8.80%● |
| ROIC | 1.89% | 5.14%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BE | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.75% |
| Payout ratio | — | 57.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BE | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.12%● | 4.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | -1.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.23%● | 0.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 57.40%● | 6.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BE or LHX?
- It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LHX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LHX leads 9 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, BE or LHX?
- Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus LHX at 4.38%.
- Does BE or LHX pay a bigger dividend?
- LHX pays a dividend (1.75% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
- Is BE or LHX more profitable?
- LHX runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus LHX at 7.71%.
- Which has been the better investment, BE or LHX?
- Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 57.40% versus LHX at 14.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bloom Energy P/E ratioL3Harris Technologies P/E ratioBloom Energy dividend yieldL3Harris Technologies dividend yieldBloom Energy ROEL3Harris Technologies ROEBloom Energy operating marginL3Harris Technologies operating marginBloom Energy revenue growthL3Harris Technologies revenue growthBloom Energy free cash flowL3Harris Technologies free cash flow
Bloom Energy & L3Harris Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.