Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or GWW?

GWW has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 266.54 and GWW at 33.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or GWW?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus GWW at 9.00%.

Does BE or GWW pay a bigger dividend?

GWW pays a dividend (0.72% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BE or GWW more profitable?

GWW runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus GWW at 9.92%.

How have BE and GWW total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 58.69% and GWW delivered 20.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and W.W. Grainger, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 24, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$60.09B

$204.02IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

GWW

W.W. Grainger, Inc.

$62.41B

$1,321.90IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs GWW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +705.8% (+29.8%/yr)GWW +330.8% (+20.0%/yr)BE compounded faster over this window

BE GWW

BE vs GWW: by the numbers

•GWW is the larger company ($62.41B vs $60.09B market cap).
•GWW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.48 vs 266.54 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GWW converts more revenue to profit (9.92% vs 7.87% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 9.00% CAGR).
•GWW pays a dividend (0.72% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	GWW
P/E ratio	266.54	33.48
Forward P/E	75.81	28.23
P/S ratio	20.92	3.29
P/B ratio	40.41	15.03
EV / EBITDA	162.06	21.41
FCF yield	0.96%	2.43%

Profitability

Metric	BE	GWW
Gross margin	31.24%	39.40%
Operating margin	11.24%	14.57%
Net margin	7.87%	9.92%
ROE	15.19%	45.27%
ROIC	7.65%	27.07%

Dividends

Metric	BE	GWW
Dividend yield	N/A	0.72%
Payout ratio	N/A	26.78%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	GWW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	9.00%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	22.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	9.51%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	58.69%	26.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or GWW?: GWW has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 266.54 and GWW at 33.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or GWW?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus GWW at 9.00%.
Does BE or GWW pay a bigger dividend?: GWW pays a dividend (0.72% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BE or GWW more profitable?: GWW runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus GWW at 9.92%.
How have BE and GWW total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 58.69% and GWW delivered 20.71% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full GWW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio W.W. Grainger P/E ratio W.W. Grainger dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE W.W. Grainger ROE Bloom Energy operating margin W.W. Grainger operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth W.W. Grainger revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow W.W. Grainger free cash flow

Bloom Energy & W.W. Grainger appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 24, 2026.