Which has grown faster, BE or GWW?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus GWW at 9.12%.

Does BE or GWW pay a bigger dividend?

GWW pays a dividend (0.73% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or GWW more profitable?

GWW runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus GWW at 9.70%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or GWW?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 61.91% versus GWW at 21.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)

GWW leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and W.W. Grainger, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 10, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

Total return — BE vs GWW

growth of $100 · last 8y

BE +928.1%GWW +297.7%BE compounded faster

BE GWW

BE vs GWW: by the numbers

•BE is the larger company ($69.35B vs $65.30B market cap).
•GWW converts more revenue to profit (9.70% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 9.12% CAGR).
•GWW pays a dividend (0.73% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or GWW?

Metric tally: BE 3 · GWW 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGWW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	GWW
P/E ratio	—	36.69
Forward P/E	119.87	29.90●
P/S ratio	33.55	3.52●
P/B ratio	89.17	16.46●
PEG ratio	—	1.65
EV / EBITDA	325.14	23.26●
FCF yield	0.28%	2.13%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	GWW
Gross margin	31.11%	39.15%●
Operating margin	8.24%	14.23%●
Net margin	0.25%	9.70%●
ROE	0.65%	45.34%●
ROIC	1.89%	27.73%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	GWW
Dividend yield	—	0.73%
Payout ratio	—	28.08%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	GWW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	9.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	22.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	7.67%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	61.91%●	25.75%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or GWW?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GWW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GWW leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, BE or GWW?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus GWW at 9.12%.
Does BE or GWW pay a bigger dividend?: GWW pays a dividend (0.73% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or GWW more profitable?: GWW runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus GWW at 9.70%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or GWW?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 61.91% versus GWW at 21.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full GWW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio W.W. Grainger P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield W.W. Grainger dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE W.W. Grainger ROE Bloom Energy operating margin W.W. Grainger operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth W.W. Grainger revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow W.W. Grainger free cash flow

Bloom Energy & W.W. Grainger appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 10, 2026.