Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or CTAS?

CTAS has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 334.57 and CTAS at 40.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or CTAS?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus CTAS at 9.62%.

Does BE or CTAS pay a bigger dividend?

CTAS pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BE or CTAS more profitable?

CTAS runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus CTAS at 17.75%.

How have BE and CTAS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 63.10% and CTAS delivered 16.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Cintas Corporation (CTAS)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Cintas Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$83.16B

$282.35IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 12:05 PM EDT

CTAS

Cintas Corporation

$79.90B

$199.66IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 12:05 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs CTAS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +911.5% (+33.5%/yr)CTAS +349.1% (+20.7%/yr)BE compounded faster over this window

BE CTAS

BE vs CTAS: by the numbers

•BE is the larger company ($83.16B vs $79.90B market cap).
•CTAS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (40.83 vs 334.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.75% vs 7.87% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 9.62% CAGR).
•CTAS pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	CTAS
P/E ratio	334.57	40.83
Forward P/E	94.67	40.95
P/S ratio	26.26	7.20
P/B ratio	50.72	15.77
EV / EBITDA	203.33	26.76
FCF yield	0.77%	2.32%

Profitability

Metric	BE	CTAS
Gross margin	31.24%	50.67%
Operating margin	11.24%	23.14%
Net margin	7.87%	17.75%
ROE	15.19%	38.91%
ROIC	7.65%	23.53%

Dividends

Metric	BE	CTAS
Dividend yield	N/A	0.90%
Payout ratio	N/A	36.66%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	CTAS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	9.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.58%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	9.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	63.10%	16.19%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or CTAS?: CTAS has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 334.57 and CTAS at 40.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or CTAS?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus CTAS at 9.62%.
Does BE or CTAS pay a bigger dividend?: CTAS pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BE or CTAS more profitable?: CTAS runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus CTAS at 17.75%.
How have BE and CTAS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 63.10% and CTAS delivered 16.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full CTAS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Cintas P/E ratio Cintas dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Cintas ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Cintas operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Cintas revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Cintas free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Cintas appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 8, 2026.