Which has grown faster, BE or CTAS?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus CTAS at 9.83%.

Does BE or CTAS pay a bigger dividend?

CTAS pays a dividend (1.05% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or CTAS more profitable?

CTAS runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus CTAS at 17.57%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or CTAS?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 55.86% versus CTAS at 23.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Cintas Corporation (CTAS)

CTAS leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Cintas Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

Total return — BE vs CTAS

growth of $100 · last 8y

BE +908.1%CTAS +228.6%BE compounded faster

BE CTAS

BE vs CTAS: by the numbers

•BE is the larger company ($71.69B vs $68.78B market cap).
•CTAS converts more revenue to profit (17.57% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 9.83% CAGR).
•CTAS pays a dividend (1.05% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or CTAS?

Metric tally: BE 3 · CTAS 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCTAS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	CTAS
P/E ratio	—	36.27
Forward P/E	57.66	31.62●
P/S ratio	32.90	6.34●
P/B ratio	87.44	14.61●
PEG ratio	—	3.09
EV / EBITDA	318.84	23.94●
FCF yield	0.29%	2.56%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	CTAS
Gross margin	31.11%	50.36%●
Operating margin	8.24%	22.95%●
Net margin	0.25%	17.57%●
ROE	0.65%	40.46%●
ROIC	1.89%	22.95%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	CTAS
Dividend yield	—	1.05%
Payout ratio	—	40.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	CTAS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	9.83%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	16.48%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	9.81%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	55.86%●	13.74%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or CTAS?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CTAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CTAS leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, BE or CTAS?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus CTAS at 9.83%.
Does BE or CTAS pay a bigger dividend?: CTAS pays a dividend (1.05% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or CTAS more profitable?: CTAS runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus CTAS at 17.57%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or CTAS?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 55.86% versus CTAS at 23.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full CTAS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Cintas P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield Cintas dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Cintas ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Cintas operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Cintas revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Cintas free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Cintas appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.