Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP)
A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
$282.35IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 12:05 PM EDT
CP
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.
$91.68IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 12:04 PM EDT
Total return — BE vs CP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yBE +911.5% (+33.5%/yr)CP +163.6% (+12.9%/yr)BE compounded faster over this window
BE CP
BE vs CP: by the numbers
- •BE is the larger company ($83.16B vs $80.59B market cap).
- •CP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.70 vs 334.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CP converts more revenue to profit (25.04% vs 7.87% net margin).
- •BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 12.34% CAGR).
- •CP pays a dividend (0.75% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BE | CP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 334.57 | 29.70 |
| Forward P/E | 94.67 | 17.22 |
| P/S ratio | 26.26 | 7.34 |
| P/B ratio | 50.72 | 2.48 |
| EV / EBITDA | 203.33 | 17.77 |
| FCF yield | 0.77% | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | BE | CP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.24% | 53.42% |
| Operating margin | 11.24% | 36.84% |
| Net margin | 7.87% | 25.04% |
| ROE | 15.19% | 8.45% |
| ROIC | 7.65% | 5.02% |
Dividends
| Metric | BE | CP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.75% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 22.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BE | CP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 28.98% | 12.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 3.04% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 38.76% | 12.22% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 63.10% | 5.67% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or CP?
- CP has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 334.57 and CP at 29.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BE or CP?
- Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus CP at 12.34%.
- Does BE or CP pay a bigger dividend?
- CP pays a dividend (0.75% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BE or CP more profitable?
- CP runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus CP at 25.04%.
- How have BE and CP total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 63.10% and CP delivered 5.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bloom Energy P/E ratioCanadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratioCanadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yieldBloom Energy ROECanadian Pacific Kansas City ROEBloom Energy operating marginCanadian Pacific Kansas City operating marginBloom Energy revenue growthCanadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growthBloom Energy free cash flowCanadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flow
Bloom Energy & Canadian Pacific Kansas City appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 8, 2026.