Which has grown faster, BE or CP?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus CP at 15.26%.

Does BE or CP pay a bigger dividend?

CP pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or CP more profitable?

CP runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus CP at 26.86%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or CP?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 57.91% versus CP at 14.43%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. (CP)

CP leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

$77.44B

$309.18Industrials

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.

$77.53B

$87.04Industrials

Total return — BE vs CP

growth of $100 · last 8y

BE +976.3%CP +129.7%BE compounded faster

BE CP

BE vs CP: by the numbers

•CP is the larger company ($77.53B vs $77.44B market cap).
•CP converts more revenue to profit (26.86% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 15.26% CAGR).
•CP pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or CP?

Metric tally: BE 3 · CP 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCP(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	CP
P/E ratio	—	24.74
Forward P/E	70.74	14.70●
P/S ratio	40.36	6.56●
P/B ratio	107.27	2.33●
PEG ratio	—	1.65
EV / EBITDA	390.90	15.90●
FCF yield	0.24%	1.90%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	CP
Gross margin	31.11%	46.67%●
Operating margin	8.24%	36.78%●
Net margin	0.25%	26.86%●
ROE	0.65%	9.56%●
ROIC	1.89%	5.09%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	CP
Dividend yield	—	0.87%
Payout ratio	—	22.93%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	CP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	15.26%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	3.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	8.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	57.91%●	3.29%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or CP?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CP leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, BE or CP?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus CP at 15.26%.
Does BE or CP pay a bigger dividend?: CP pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or CP more profitable?: CP runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus CP at 26.86%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or CP?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 57.91% versus CP at 14.43%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full CP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Canadian Pacific Kansas City P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield Canadian Pacific Kansas City dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Canadian Pacific Kansas City ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Canadian Pacific Kansas City operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Canadian Pacific Kansas City revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Canadian Pacific Kansas City free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Canadian Pacific Kansas City appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.