Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$46.06Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$175.01Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BAM vs MRSH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yBAM +69.0% (+14.0%/yr)MRSH +11.6% (+2.8%/yr)BAM compounded faster over this window
BAM MRSH
BAM vs MRSH: by the numbers
- •MRSH is the larger company ($83.52B vs $73.55B market cap).
- •MRSH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.39 vs 26.78 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BAM converts more revenue to profit (51.60% vs 14.24% net margin).
- •BAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.43% vs 8.62% CAGR).
- •BAM pays the higher dividend yield (3.98% vs 2.09%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.78 | 21.39 |
| Forward P/E | 24.77 | 16.75 |
| P/S ratio | 13.61 | 2.99 |
| P/B ratio | 1.58 | 5.50 |
Profitability
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 70.20% | 42.38% |
| Operating margin | 60.60% | 21.62% |
| Net margin | 51.60% | 14.24% |
| ROE | 5.99% | 26.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.98% | 2.09% |
| Payout ratio | 109.30% | 45.11% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.43% | 8.62% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.24% | 16.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 3.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAM or MRSH?
- MRSH has the lower trailing P/E: BAM trades at 26.78 and MRSH at 21.39. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BAM or MRSH?
- Over the past five years, BAM grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus MRSH at 8.62%.
- Does BAM or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?
- BAM yields 3.98% and MRSH yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BAM or MRSH more profitable?
- BAM runs the higher net margin — BAM at 51.60% versus MRSH at 14.24%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Brookfield Asset Management P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioBrookfield Asset Management dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldBrookfield Asset Management ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEBrookfield Asset Management operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginBrookfield Asset Management revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growth
Brookfield Asset Management & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.