Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
BAM leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics, though MRSH is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$49.02Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$176.22Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BAM vs MRSH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yBAM +72.9%MRSH +10.3%BAM compounded faster
BAM MRSH
BAM vs MRSH: by the numbers
- •MRSH is the larger company ($84.90B vs $78.27B market cap).
- •MRSH trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.26 vs 30.86 P/E).
- •BAM converts more revenue to profit (52.33% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •BAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.43% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •BAM pays the higher dividend yield (3.96% vs 2.02%).
Which is better, BAM or MRSH?
Metric tally: BAM 8 · MRSH 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMRSH(lower P/E)
GrowthBAM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityBAM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 30.86 | 22.26● |
| Forward P/E | 26.52 | 17.14● |
| P/S ratio | 16.08 | 3.14● |
| P/B ratio | 10.10 | 5.94● |
| PEG ratio | 2.15● | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 71.84%● | 42.37% |
| Operating margin | 63.13%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 52.33%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 32.88%● | 26.94% |
| ROIC | 14.45%● | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.96%● | 2.02% |
| Payout ratio | 122.08% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAM | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.43%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 16.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 6.14% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BAM or MRSH?
- It depends on your goal. value: MRSH (lower P/E); growth: BAM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAM (higher dividend yield); quality: BAM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BAM leads 8 to 4.
- Is BAM or MRSH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MRSH is cheaper: BAM trades at a 30.86 P/E and MRSH at 22.26.
- Which has grown faster, BAM or MRSH?
- Over the past five years, BAM grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus MRSH at 9.28%.
- Does BAM or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?
- BAM yields 3.96% and MRSH yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BAM or MRSH more profitable?
- BAM runs the higher net margin — BAM at 52.33% versus MRSH at 14.26%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Brookfield Asset Management P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioBrookfield Asset Management dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldBrookfield Asset Management ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEBrookfield Asset Management operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginBrookfield Asset Management revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthBrookfield Asset Management free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Brookfield Asset Management & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.