Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
BAH leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
$72.53IndustrialsAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BAH vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 16yBAH +385.0%SIMO +9665.2%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BAH SIMO
BAH vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $8.70B market cap).
- •BAH trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.39 vs 21.10 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 7.01% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 7.05% CAGR).
- •BAH pays the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.74%).
Which is better, BAH or SIMO?
Metric tally: BAH 9 · SIMO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBAH(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAH(higher dividend yield)
QualityBAH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.39● | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | 11.94● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 0.71● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 7.20 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | 1.20 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.49● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | 11.96%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | BAH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.91% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 9.51% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 7.01% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 64.73%● | 18.76% |
| ROIC | 18.60%● | 9.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | BAH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.14%● | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | 33.00% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAH | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.05% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 17.83%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.31% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BAH or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: BAH (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAH (higher dividend yield); quality: BAH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BAH leads 9 to 8.
- Is BAH or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BAH is cheaper: BAH trades at a 11.39 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, BAH or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — BAH at a 7.05% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does BAH or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- BAH yields 3.14% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BAH or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — BAH at 7.01% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, BAH or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — BAH at 10.74% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booz Allen Hamilton P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioBooz Allen Hamilton dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldBooz Allen Hamilton ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEBooz Allen Hamilton operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginBooz Allen Hamilton revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthBooz Allen Hamilton free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Booz Allen Hamilton & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.